To: metmom
The only definition left then, is to mean physical brother. Sorry. That’s not how it works. Either in usage (see LXX and if you believe Mary had a sister named Mary) nor according to historical documents. The “brothers” of Jesus were the sons of Clopas, not Joseph.
608 posted on
08/09/2019 8:27:46 PM PDT by
papertyger
(Trump, A president so great, that Democrats who said they would leave America if he won, stayed!)
To: papertyger
Either in usage (see LXX and if you believe Mary had a sister named Mary) nor according to historical documents. The “brothers” of Jesus were the sons of Clopas, not Joseph. Historical documents?
So what?
Show me from scripture.
622 posted on
08/09/2019 8:55:20 PM PDT by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
To: papertyger
The “brothers” of Jesus were the sons of Clopas, not Joseph. You've stated your case; now - show your evidence.
650 posted on
08/10/2019 5:18:48 AM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: papertyger
The “brothers” of Jesus were the sons of Clopas, not Joseph.......
That is true and it is pretty well documented for any one who wants to know the truth but make believe Christians are not interested in the truth, they just want every one to think they have all kinds of faith.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson