The interior of the Holy House of Mary, Mother of God, as it is today in Loreto, Italy.
Posted on 12/08/2018 7:17:28 AM PST by NYer
How did the Holy House take off from its foundations and reappear intact about 2,000 miles away, where it remains to this day?
At a conference organized by the “Amici del Timone” Cultural Center in Staggia Senese, Italy, titled “The Story of the Incredible Move of the House of Mary of Nazareth to Loreto,” a topic was developed which challenges engineering.
Indeed, the Holy House, birthplace of Our Lady and where the Archangel Gabriel announced to her the Incarnation, has been for many centuries in the town of Loreto (Santa Casa di Loreto), in the Marche region of Italy, facing the Adriatic Sea.
However, the Annunciation took place in Nazareth, in the Holy Land, where the foundations of the Holy House remain to this day. When compared with the dimensions and characteristics of the Loreto House, they match perfectly; but the similarities and concordances do not end there.
How did the Holy House take off, so to speak, from its foundations and reappear about 2,000 miles away, where it remains intact to this day?
According to historical evidence, the move took place in the thirteenth century; but how could it have been done given the poor technological resources of the time?
The move is attributed to an angelic action officially recognized by Popes and sustained by saints. However, such authoritative approvals are not intended to explain the material procedure, which carried an object the size of a house from one continent to another practically overnight.
This transfer, however, was confirmed by historical, documentary and archaeological evidence. Once again, for the astonishment of many, science confirms the Church.
Prof. Giorgio Nicolini, who devoted his life of study and research to the case, spoke at this conference. Based on these scientific evidences, he proved indisputably the veracity of the miraculous transfer.
During his lecture, Professor Nicolini demonstrated the existence of many documents and eyewitness accounts of the transfer, which science and human method cannot explain. He also established a chronology of the change of location.
1. On May 9, 1291, the Holy House was still in Nazareth.
2. On the night of May 9 to 10, 1291, it traveled nearly 2,000 miles and reached Tersatto (now Trsat), in the region of Dalmatia, in what is now a suburb of Rijeka, Croatia.
On that occasion, Nicolò Frangipane, feudal lord of Tersatto personally sent a delegation to Nazareth to ascertain whether the Holy House had indeed disappeared from its original place. The emissaries not only verified its disappearance but found the foundation on which the house was built and from which the walls had been taken away as a block. Around these foundations in Nazareth, the Basilica of the Annunciation was built. In Loreto, the Holy House stands firmly, without its foundation, directly on the ground.
3. On the night of December 9 to 10, 1294, the Holy House disappeared from Tersatto and landed “in various places” of Italy. For nine months it stayed on a hillside overlooking the port of Ancona, which thus came to be called “Posatora,” from the Latin “posat et ora” (to set down, or land, and pray).
A church was built on the site as a memorial, as was recorded at the time and signed by a priest “Don Matteo,” probably an eyewitness.
Two tombstones also commemorate this occurrence. One is from the same time period of the event and is written in old Vulgar Latin. The other, from the sixteenth century, is written in vernacular and is a copy of the older.
Posatora’s oldest tombstone already mentioned “Our Lady of Loreto,” making it clear that the inscription was done after the House’s departure from the site.
4. In 1295, after nine months in Posatora, the Holy House moved to a forest that belonged to a woman called Loreta, near the town of Recanati. That is where the name Loreto comes from.
5. Between 1295 and 1296, after spending eight months in this location the Holy House was miraculously transported to a farm on Mount Prodo belonging to two brothers of the Antici family.
6. In 1296, after four months at this farm, the Holy House departed and landed on a public road on Mount Prodo connecting Recanati to Ancona, where it remains to this day.
Countless other elements attest to the historical truth of this inexplicable translation of the Holy House. Three churches were built in Ancona—two still existing—testaments that eyewitnesses saw the “flying” Santa Casa arrive in Ancona and stop in Posatora.
Moreover, in Forio, on Ischia Island, fishermen who traded with Ancona returned narrating the events that had taken place in 1295. Their reports led the city inhabitants to erect a basilica dedicated to “Santa Maria di Loreto.” They also saw the Holy House in Ancona with their own eyes.
Various bishops of the region approved the veneration of the miraculous translations. For centuries the Popes renewed the approvals until Urban VIII, in 1624, definitively established December 10 as the Feast of the Translation of the Holy House of Mary, Mother of God.
Several Popes, including Paul II, Julius II, Leo X, Pius IX, Leo XIII and Pius XI documented their recognition of the translation. These respective documents, beyond their religious aspect in which the Popes recognize the event as supernatural, are recognized as valuable documents by historical science.
Professor Nicolini strongly reprimanded the materialistic mentality, at times agnostic, atheistic or Protestant, which seeks to discredit the authenticity of the Holy House venerated in Loreto.
In a way, this opposition encouraged deeper studies, which ended up proving the Holy House actually came from the Holy Land. Proofs include the chemical composition of the material used to build the house, its shape, and many architectural details.
Some, denying the angelic translation, went so far as to fabricate a story that a fanciful princely family from Epirus named “Angeli” had dismantled the house and transported it brick by brick at the request of the Crusaders facing the destructive advance of Muslims. That “family” then rebuilt the house in Loreto.
Such an operation, with the transportation conditions of the thirteenth century, would have been a more miraculous feat than the angelic translation.
The stones and bricks are kept together with a mortar whose physical and chemical composition is found only in Palestine and precisely in the region of Nazareth. They are nonexistent in the Marche region or anywhere else in Italy.
Moreover, if the house was dismantled and rebuilt in place after place along its journey—as claimed by its fanciful objectors—one cannot understand how it could possibly have maintained the exact geometric proportions of the Nazareth house, whose foundations, to this day, match perfectly the walls of Loreto.
Nor would it have been possible that nobody saw or heard the house being dismantled and later rebuilt, especially in the brief span of one night in the center of the shrine in Nazareth and then again in Croatia and Italy.
Even more inexplicable is the fact that the Holy House finally came to rest across an old dirt highway. On this road, the passage of animals and carriages naturally opened ruts in the center of the roadway, raising the roadsides, and forming ditches on both sides. Thus, the way the house landed, its three walls, with no foundation, are supported partly on ground and partly over open air. Today pilgrims can see this for themselves through a glass floor.
The Recanati City Hall, moreover, had already at that time forbidden the building of houses on public roads and had ordered demolished all buildings found to be in violation of the ordinance. How, then, could someone have rebuilt a house cutting across the road without anyone noticing?
Another great hurdle comes from the lack of means in those days to carry an entire house, even if dismantled brick by brick and stone by stone. It would weigh a few tons. Transport by road would have likely been unfeasible due the delay and the amount of chariots, animals and men it would require. Transportation by sea, while more feasible, would also have been too time-consuming and prone to loss due to storms.
More complicated still would be to cut the walls in segments and take them intact on a 2,000 mile journey and then glue them back together without leaving traces of the joints. These material factors, Prof. Giorgio Nicolini explained, postulate the impossibility of such transportation with the technical means of the time.
From Professor Nicolini’s long and detailed demonstration it is clearly much more reasonable to believe the angelic translation resulting from a wondrous work of God, for Whom nothing is impossible, and Who has worked far greater miracles.
For human hands to have performed such a translation is to consider an event even more miraculous than that done by the work of angels.
Of course it's not, for those who are not.
You seem to be assuming a false binary: Faith or Fraud. Not everything is either Faith or Fraud. Some things are just Fact.
The House of Loreto having been first in Nazareth is not part of the deposit of Faith--- any more than the Law of Gravity is part of the Deposit of Faith. They both depend on evidence.
Some people credit evidence, and some do not. I understand that.
Don’t get your knickers in a bunch Eagleone. I love how use the profanity card all the damn time. Don’t be such a little wilting flower. What do you think I am just going to let you get away with your chronic anti catholicism?
Boring.
Science has not confirmed that the building ‘flew’ anywhere.
It’s a nice story though.
Whatever your personal limitations, though, do not tell me that I and the majority of Christians (Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Anglicans ,Lutherans, and many other Protestants) worship Mary. You continue to slander us by repeatedly claiming that we do, and this observably manifests malice.
BTW: I have never once heard you refer to Mary as Blessed.
But despite you, Christians honor Mary at least as much as we honor our own mothers, and, as prophesied, will continue to do so for all generations.
I don’t believe the story, but the photo is not of the house. What you see in the photo was built around the exterior of the original house much later.
And the House of Nazareth shows Mary was, like almost all of her neighbors, quite poor.
That was the house where the Annunciation took place. It was not Joseph's house.
The Annunciation and Incarnation took place before Joseph had taken Mary into his home.
Sit down, junior.
I see you can't even follow one of the basic rules of this site.
This is all you have to offer to the discussion....a futile mind attempting to express itself through profanity.
Yeah, I’ve heard of it. Maybe the angels could drop our current Pope from the high side of the Grand Canyon.
Also, I find the protective nestling of this tiny stone house inside a splendid Basilica quite touching. It has echoes of the incident where the Splendid ones of the East honor the Child in the Cave: the rich honoring the poor.
I'm saying this for you, NYer. I don't think e is listening.
The truth of the Roman Catholic worship of Mary stings the Roman Catholic. I can understand why the average RC has to deny it.
Yet what is found in this house? An altar to Mary.
BTW: I have never once heard you refer to Mary as Blessed.
Nor will you....for it is but one of many titles accorded to her by Roman Catholicism which are not warranted by Scripture and stand in contradiction of Scripture.
I will ascribe to her what Scripture does... 48“For He has had regard for the humble state of His bondslave; For behold, from this time on all generations will count me blessed.
But despite you, Christians honor Mary at least as much as we honor our own mothers, and, as prophesied, will continue to do so for all generations.
I assure you...there are no altars built for my mom that I kneel before and pray to...unlike what Rome has done with Mary. And please...don't trot out the laughable argument from Staples about pictures of your mom and dad. It's embarrassing for Roman Catholics to resort to that to defend their idolatry.
For My own sake, My very own sake, I will act; for how can I let Myself be defamed? I will not yield My glory to another. Isaiah 48:11 NASB
Roman Catholics might want to read Isaiah.
True Roman catholics worship Mary, Queen of heaven the church says.
Messed up crap right there.
Sounds to me like he’s aware of the evils of catholicism.
I’m pro Jesus Christ and against the true Roman catholicism cult. They don’t worship God. Only think they do. There’s a lot of articles on the subject if you want to read.
Good to see you. Great article.
.....:)
Bless you.
+1
The church in Trsat still gets a lot of Catholic pilgrims. They have a statue of Pope John Paul II kneeling in prayer, based on photos taken when he visited the church.
Numerous contemporary examples of “Angelic Transport” exist.
For instance, just the other day a caravan of faithful peaceful people were transported thousands of miles in just a few days from Guatemala to Tijuana in hopes being resettled in America by Faithful Catholics.
Rumor has it, and it has never been found by experts to be untrue, that “Angelic Transport” also provides checks into the mailboxes of these same peaceful and faithful people with which they can pursue their Godly paths.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
