Replies

>> If you are saying that Jesus was not raised from the dead^false in His incarnate body, which would include His blood^unprovable, then you are preaching antiChrist statements^{I am not}. <<

Wrong suppositions.

>> Of course His blood was RESURRECTED with His body: "Life is in the blood" <<

True only for the mortal body, not the immortal one.

>> And, of course His blood was shed, once and for all, on the Cross prior to His resurrection. <<

True, It was shed, gone, not stuffed back in the resurrected body, but presented in Heaven as the price for discharging the sin debt of mankind. Being incorruptible originally, now present and alive, uncoagulated on the Mercy Seat, before The Father.

>> For you to deny that Christ was resurrected in the flesh (i.e. with blood running through His veins)^unprovable is to take some weird Mormon antiChrist point of view that Jesus was a Spirit when He was Resurrected, and not flesh and bone <<

Wrong assumptions again, saying what I did not say, meaning what I did not mean, and twisting my doctrine. What Jesus was showing was that He was not an evanescent, immaterial, bodiless entity like a hologram or projector image, but a dimensional human body of flesh, bones, and motivating spirit, able to go through walls and take other human form (Mk. 16:2; Lk. 24:16;, Rev. 3:13-16, 5:6, 19:12).

>> (and blood... for blood is created in our bones!) <<

Only in the mortal body; not in the immortal body, AFIK, where life is in the Spirit.

=====

All your theories here are unsupported imaginations and false.

For The Christ, The First-begotten from the dead ones, life is in the spirit, not in the blood.

"Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have" (Lk. 24:39 AV).

Jesus has a body of flesh and bones, not flesh and blood.

He was raised from out of the dead ones, and as the first resurrected human, He was changed, as His servants will be:

1 Cor. 15:52,53 AV:
⁵² In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump:
for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible,
and we shall be changed. ⁵³For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality"

It will be a changed flesh body, with all the normal appendages and healthy, but the flesh will be incorruptible, with no blood necessary. In it, the Spirit gives life, as it did of Jesus, both man and Deity. But the flesh and bones is a vehicle with humanoid operation, but without blood, for we shall be like Him:

1 John 3:2 AV:
² Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be:
but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

We will also have flesh and bone like His, with life in the Spirit, not in blood any longer.

"It is the spirit that quickeneth^{gives life}; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life" (Jn. 6:63 AV).

Yeah, you sound and preach like the Mormons, mincing words and twisting simple meanings.

Here you go. You cannot back out of your Anti Christ error now:

Acts 2:31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.

FLESH: Strong's G4561 -- Flesh (the soft substance of the living body, which covers the bones and is permeated with blood) of both man and beasts

Jesus was NOT resurrected into an "immortal body" because that would be a SPIRIT...

His FLESH did not suffer corruption at the Resurrection.

So what are you talking about?

Jesus walked through walls by the same power of the Holy Spirit that transported Phillip miles and miles away, and they both had these miracles in their flesh and bone (i.e. with BLOOD) in their bodies.

How would Jesus digest food, if He had no blood to give life to His flesh, to transport nutrients to the body and marrow in the bone?

Why did Jesus ask for food when He was hungry in Luke? To evidence the miracle of His resurrection, that He still was in His carnate (flesh and blood and bone) body.

You are just wrong.

... His soul was not left in hell, neither His flesh did see corruption.

Christ's flesh did not see corruption at the Resurrection, because He was resurrected in His incarnate body of FLESH (BLOOD AND BONE).

And you preach a damnable heresy, that Christ was resurrected into an immortal body, which is antiChrist, which discredits the Resurrection

You negate the miracle of the resurrection by preaching He had a glorified/immortal/superspiritual body without any blood in it... this is antChrist...

And why does your theory negate the Resurrection? Because you infer that Christ's sufferings on the Cross and Resurrection were somehow less human because of His Divinity. This diminishes the miracle of it. Christ died in His full humanity as a man, and was raised in His full humanity as a man.

Otherwise, there is no propitiation for our sins!

Otherwise, there is no miracle of the incarnation!

Otherwise, there you are saying Christ was not fully human!

Otherwise, there is no SACRIFICE in what Christ did, because it didn't really hurt, He didn't really suffer as a man, because it all happened because He was God.

You are preaching Anti Christ.

Get thee behind me, Satan.