Replies

Yeah, you sound and preach like the Mormons, mincing words and twisting simple meanings.

Here you go. You cannot back out of your Anti Christ error now:

Acts 2:31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.

FLESH: Strong's G4561 -- Flesh (the soft substance of the living body, which covers the bones and is permeated with blood) of both man and beasts

Jesus was NOT resurrected into an "immortal body" because that would be a SPIRIT...

His FLESH did not suffer corruption at the Resurrection.

So what are you talking about?

Jesus walked through walls by the same power of the Holy Spirit that transported Phillip miles and miles away, and they both had these miracles in their flesh and bone (i.e. with BLOOD) in their bodies.

How would Jesus digest food, if He had no blood to give life to His flesh, to transport nutrients to the body and marrow in the bone?

Why did Jesus ask for food when He was hungry in Luke? To evidence the miracle of His resurrection, that He still was in His carnate (flesh and blood and bone) body.

You are just wrong.

... His soul was not left in hell, neither His flesh did see corruption.

Christ's flesh did not see corruption at the Resurrection, because He was resurrected in His incarnate body of FLESH (BLOOD AND BONE).

And you preach a damnable heresy, that Christ was resurrected into an immortal body, which is antiChrist, which discredits the Resurrection

You negate the miracle of the resurrection by preaching He had a glorified/immortal/superspiritual body without any blood in it... this is antChrist...

And why does your theory negate the Resurrection? Because you infer that Christ's sufferings on the Cross and Resurrection were somehow less human because of His Divinity. This diminishes the miracle of it. Christ died in His full humanity as a man, and was raised in His full humanity as a man.

Otherwise, there is no propitiation for our sins!

Otherwise, there is no miracle of the incarnation!

Otherwise, there you are saying Christ was not fully human!

Otherwise, there is no SACRIFICE in what Christ did, because it didn't really hurt, He didn't really suffer as a man, because it all happened because He was God.

You are preaching Anti Christ.

Get thee behind me, Satan.

After resurrection, Jesus was apparently walking around. His disciples and some 380 other people saw Him for forty days before His final ascension. What did He look like? What did He eat? What did He say? of His conversations, we only know a little. What did He do? We know that He built a fire and roasted some fish. But this we do know:

even after only about 48 hours after a spear opened his side and poked through to break the pericardial sac, penetrate his heart, and release the blood and edema, His open wounds were not bleeding, and they were not healed. My belief is that He will look the same in Heaven, so everyone can always know it is Him, not just some substitute filling in when He wants to sleep or go somewhere else. I also believe that everyone else will have a fine, perfect, unwounded, body so that we can tell who is NOT Him.

What I do know is that His resurrected body could not have supported blood circulation. If it could, explain to me with Bible verses--not just your own imaginations--how there could have been circulating blood in His body.

If you can't explain that, I'm not going to give you any more of my precious time.

In the meantime, work on your logic circuits. They are not working.