You claimed that Jesus’ body does not have any blood. Yet you cannot explain how you arrived at this absurd conclusion?
Maybe someone else on this thread can explain what you mean?
Bp, I’ve not paid attention to this conversation and don’t have time to go back and read it.
Is there a passage in Scripture that indicates a resurrection body has blood?
I can’t think of one off the top of my head, but maybe you can.
When Jesus died on the cross, His body exsanguinated. There is no record of it ever being replaced. At least, the Risen Jesus' open wounds were not bleeding when He invited Thomas to test them:
"Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing" (Jn. 20:27 AV).
And also, His Blood, having been separated forever from His Body, was offered in the Holy of Holies of Heaven to pay for our sins:
"Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold,
from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers;
But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot: . . ." (1 Pet. 1:18-19 AV).
Jesus' Blood could not be the sacrifice while it was still in His Body.
Your assumptions are just that. They have no Biblical basis. This is not an argument about what you think. It is about what the Bible says and does not say.
I’ve been on vacation camping and working off an iPad with slow to no internet service.
Sorry for the delay in answering. The long and short is that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of heaven.
Our glorified heavenly bodies are not the same substance as our eathly bodies. Our earthly bodies can not survive outside of a very narrow range of parameters.