You still have not answered this one. Maybe perhaps you don’t really have an answer??
For example, you made the outlandish claim that Jesus does not have any blood in His resurrected body. That implies He does not have a heart either, for the purpose of a heart is to pump blood. He would also not have any need for veins or arteries. He would also not need lungs to oxygenate His blood. So ultimately I am using human reason to show that your statement about Jesus not having any blood is in its own peculiar way a denial of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ, body and soul. It implies that Jesus is now not human in any way, He is a pure spirit only. But by Faith I know that He resurrected under His own power from the dead. Dead as in dead as a door nail, He bled so much that there was nothing left when Longinus pierced His side. I also believe that His resurrection gives me hope that I will also be resurrected, body and soul from the dead. That is an example of how the gift of Faith can show that a concept such as Jesus-not-having-blood is absurd and does not belong to the sacred deposit of Faith left to us by Jesus Christ through His Apostles.
Protection of the magisterium needed immediately!
Clean up on Aisle 3!
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/priest-removed-ministry-personal-leave-12835599
Apparently, the magisterium failed to teach about Adam & Eve sufficiently to protect to their priests (and their altars) - and the Vatican.
You assume a lot.
You are wrong about all of them.
Please don’t insult the meaning of “syllogism” by claiming a logical process in your Post #568. There is nothing present but “reasonings”—figments of your imagination—which is a pejorative use of rational thinking to attain an illogical conclusion.