Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
Neither did Jesus or St. Paul, both of whom were, like Naumann, celibate.

Nobody knows if Paul had ever been married or not. Scripture doesn't tell us.

Catholics sure make a lot of assumptions about things to support their theology.

And so what if they were celibate? Does that make them more spiritual than a married person who is not?

Cause you all sure seem to treat it as if it's a virtue of some kind, just like sex is bad or something.

59 posted on 06/11/2018 2:12:24 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

I didn’t imply St. Paul was never ever married. He may have been a widower, like St. Peter. I just meant he was celibate by the time he was writing the Epistles, as he himself attested. And as he recommended.

Please note that Catholics not only believe that marital sex is good -— we believe it is Holy, a constituent element of a Sacrament, and thus a channel of a specific Sacramental grace.

And interestingly, celibacy is not.


72 posted on 06/11/2018 6:44:37 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Y'all behave yourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: metmom
Cause you all sure seem to treat it as if it's a virtue of some kind, just like sex is bad or something.
 
 
It MUST be; or else what LOGICAL (or biblical) reason would the Catholic Church INSIST that M&J NEVER had sexual relations?
 
 

111 posted on 06/12/2018 7:24:26 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson