[Luircin]

The writer is guilty of very BAD eisegesis. He ignores all the context of the verses he uses to justify his views.

And at the same time blatantly ignores all the passages in Scripture that contradict his views or just dismisses them.

[Salvation]

You didn’t watch the video did you?

[daniel1212]

The writer is guilty of very BAD eisegesis. He ignores all the context of the verses he uses to justify his views. And at the same time blatantly ignores all the passages in Scripture that contradict his views or just dismisses them.

Since for Catholicism Scripture is reduced to being a abused servant which is compelled to only support Catholicism, and can only mean what she says it does in any conflict, and that church doctrine is said to be supreme, then why expect anything less?