Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: pgkdan

“I wonder what Paul would have to say about the “ancient” order of deaconesses.”

Actually, he did peak about them - Phoebe in particular - Romans chapter 16 verses 1-2.


5 posted on 01/18/2018 9:49:35 AM PST by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: LouieFisk

Actually, he did peak about them - Phoebe in particular - Romans chapter 16 verses 1-2.”

But I don’t think it was in the context you are hoping for.

Incidentally, just because something is ‘in the Bible’ does not in itself mean that it is acceptable or pleasing to God.

The devil tempting Jesus is recorded in Scripture, but no one can say we should therefore temp the Lord our God.


7 posted on 01/18/2018 9:53:26 AM PST by Paulie (America without Christ is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: LouieFisk

Nope. The scripture you reference only refers to her as a ‘servant’. Paul specifically states in 1 Timothy 3:8-13 the requirements for a deacon. Among other things a deacon must be the husband of one wife. That means male deacons only. No deaconesses.


11 posted on 01/18/2018 10:20:12 AM PST by pgkdan (The Silent Majority STILL Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson