Posted on 11/28/2017 12:09:34 PM PST by ebb tide
For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, 23but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, 24but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
Thanks for proving St. Paul correct, lol.
So Paul was able to predict that not everyone would accept a brand new religion when the old one, founded by G-d Himself, was still around? Wow . . . what a prophet![/sarcasm]
Also, to you, the very fact that Pauls writings wound up part of the self-canonized Protestant bible in and of itself proves him.
Its funny how you chrstians spend hundreds of posts ripping each other to shreds because your different versions of the religion (all of them allegedly true) are mutually contradictory, and then have the gall to pretend it is still self-evidently true!
You good chrstians may now return to consigning each other to hell. Its what youre best at.
NOTE: This was accidentally sent as a private reply.
You deny, in spite of the historical evidence, that Jesus existed?
Considering that your version of chrstianity is a fifteen hundred year later reconstruction of something that never existed, and that during those fifteen hundred years actual historical chrstians were living as monks and hermits and performing post-Biblical chrstian rituals (and living in a constant fear of dying and going to hell despite being chrstians), you're not really the best apologist for the religion.
Thanks once against for proving Scripture correct:
For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt. 7For land that has drunk the rain that often falls on it, and produces a crop useful to those for whose sake it is cultivated, receives a blessing from God. 8But if it bears thorns and thistles, it is worthless and near to being cursed, and its end is to be burned.
Chrstianity is like evolution; everything "proves it." So you're not saying much. Also, considering you think that the "new testament's" interpretation of the Hebrew Bible is "self-evidently true," your threshold for "proof" is, again, very low.
Methinks that your use or *conservative Christian* is not what others use is.
Does God call water baptism, in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, a work? Or does man call it a work?
Maybe that's what it appears to those who use Catholicism as their primary example of Christianity, but the Savior I worship rose from the dead and is seated at the right hand of the Father in heaven.
You must not be like that ET fella; who doesn't read everything with his screenname in the TO: box.
You seem to have found the incoming with no problem.
Only if you think Jesus is someone or something other than God Himself come in the flesh.
You are right. There are very few Fundamentalist Protestants in my country. Thanks for the information. I know very little about Fundamentalist Protestants (except for the sola scriptura bull).
> Unfortunately, I ain’t there yet. I still have a lot of problems I’m trying to work through. Pirqei-’Avot says if one’s “wisdom” exceeds ones good deeds one’s “wisdom” will not stand. Unfortunately, I’m more light than heat. But I tell myself it’s better than doing absolutely nothing.
We can only do our best. Pirqei-’Avot is not Law. Whatever it says is secondary.
Two TarBabies, sittin’ on a log.
One had thin skin; the other’s like a hog.
If y’all don’t ping ‘em,
invectives? they will sling ‘em.
Give ‘em both the old days, when we Prots were free to flog.
I think that’s your best yet....in spite of the tarbaby reference! :)
They’re both wrong; so that makes us right.
O... K...
“I don’t even try with you FRiend.”:
Right, because you’re consistently wrong and I consistently show that to be the case.
“No more than I’d try to have a logical conversation with an antifa member. I simply leave it to God.”
Except in that scenario you are the antifa member. That’s why you don’t post logical arguments. You just throw your Molotov cocktail and run away.
“I simply wish you the best and say, “sure, vlad.””
I don’t think you wish me the best. I think you just do all you can do with what little you have.
“Vlads Rules of Internet Debate #4...dwell in the minors trying to make a point.”
Once again you make the mistake of casting your errors as “minor”. I guess you can’t do much else.
The seven laws we now call the "Noahide Laws" were made up by G-d and given to Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. It literally goes all the way back to the beginning, unlike your paltry 2000 year old innovation.
Looks like you guys need to get on the same page.
I am a Torah scholar with a formal education in Torah Law. Please do not lecture me about Torah.
Ah, the logical fallacy of Appeal to Authority raises its head.
Cant you do better??
If you are an expert, post proof, which you failed to do.
And you did lie earlier. Pretty sure the Torah records that God hates lying...
So the claims of expertise seem limp.
Once again you make the mistake of casting your errors as minor. I guess you cant do much else.
Once again, you continue to exercise Vlad's Rule #4....and #2.
ummm...you've busted a number of the rules with just this one post.
#2
#6
Which is not allowed by the Torah, and is idolatry.
Post proof, bro.
Noahid is a made up thing, so your view does not surprise me.
You’re right. The seven laws we now call the “Noahide Laws” were made up by G-d and given to Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.
Post proof from the Scriptures, bro. It isnt there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.