Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

De Mattei: Pope Francis and his “Lutheran turning point”
Rorate Caeli ^ | November 8, 2017 | Roberto de Mattei

Posted on 11/09/2017 1:57:06 PM PST by ebb tide

De Mattei: Pope Francis and his “Lutheran turning point”

Roberto de Mattei
Corrispondenza Romana
November 8 2017




On October 31st 2016, Pope Francis inaugurated the year of Luther by meeting with representatives of Lutheranism from all over the world in the Swedish Cathedral of Lund. Since then, meetings and “ecumenical” celebrations ad abundantiam have followed one after the other in the Catholic Church.

A year exactly from that date, the “”Lutheran turning point ”was sealed by a symbolic act the gravity of which very few have noticed. The Vatican Post Office issued a stamp which celebrates the birth of Protestantism on October 31st 1517, the date Luther hung his 95 theses on the door of Wittenberg Cathedral.

V Centenary of the Protestant Reformationcan be read at the top of the stamp, presented on October 31st of this year by the Vatican Philatelic Office.  The official communiqué describes the stamp: It depicts Jesus Crucified in the foreground on a gold, timeless background showing Wittenberg city. In an attitude of penance, on their knees respectively on the left and the right of the the Cross, Martin Luther holds a Bible, source and point of his doctrine, while Philip Melanchthon, theologian and a friend of Martin Luther’s, one of the most important protagonists of the Reformation, holds in his hand the Augsburg Confession, Confessio Augustuana, the first official exposition of the principles of Protestantism drawn up by him.”

The substitution of Our Lady and St. John at the foot of the Cross with the  two heresiarchs, Luther and Melanchthon is a blasphemous offense that no Catholic cardinal or bishop has, to date, openly condemned. The significance of this image is explained by the joint declaration of the World Lutheran Federation and the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity, published the same day as the stamp. The note refers to the positive outcome of the dialogue between Catholics and Lutherans, endorsing the “new understanding of those XVI century events which lead to our separation” and affirms how both sides are “very grateful for the theological and spiritual gifts received through the Reformation”.


As if that weren’t enough, around the same time, La Civiltà Cattolica, the Pope’s “unofficial” voice, celebrated Luther  with  an article by Father Giancarlo Pani (Martin Luther, Five Hundred Years Later, in La Civiltà Cattolica , of October 21st – November 4th 2017, pp. 119-130)

Father Pani is the same priest who said in 2014 that the Fathers of the Council of Trent had admitted the possibility of divorce and remarriage in the case of adultery, according to the custom established in the schismatic Greek Church. Now he is sustaining that Martin Luther was in no way a heretic, but an authentic “reformer”.  In fact, “ the theses of Wittenberg are not a challenge, nor a rebellion against authority, but the proposal to renew the proclamation of the Gospel, in the sincere desire for a “reform” in the Church”. (p.128). Despite the claim “ by the Church of Rome and Luther of incarnating the truth in toto and being dispensers of it ” “ the role Luther had as a witness to the faith cannot be denied: He is “the reformer”;  he was able to initiate a process of “reform”  where the results of it  have also benefited the Catholic Church.”

If this is the case then he has been unjustly persecuted and defamed by the Catholic Church for 500 years. The time has come to rehabilitate him.  And in order to rehabilitate him we cannot limit ourselves to presenting only his prophetic side, but must make the Church accept and put into practice his demands of reform. And the Post-Synod Exhortation Amoris Laetitia represents a decisive stage on this path. They are not wrong then the authors of the Correctio filialis  (to Pope Francis) when they underlined “the affinity between Luther’s ideas on the law, justification and matrimony and those taught  or favored by Pope Francis in Amoris laetitia and elsewhere.” 

At this point it should be remembered that Pope Francis, like Father Pani, belongs to the Company of Jesus, whose Founder, St. Ignatius of Loyola, was the champion of the Faith that Divine Providence raised up in the XVI century against Lutheranism. In Germany, apostles like St. Peter Canisio and Blessed Peter Fabro, fought every inch of the way against the heretics and on the terrain of anti-Protestant controversy no-one can surpass St. Robert Bellarmino.

La Civiltà Cattolica was founded in 1850, with the support of Pius IX, and had a role of doctrinal defense against the errors of the time for a very long time. From its very first edition, on April 6th 1850, it dedicated an extensive anonymous essay (by Father Matteo Liberatore) on The Political Rationalism of the Italian Revolution, in which he saw Protestantism as the cause of all modern errors. These theses were developed, among others, by two famous Jesuit theologians: Fathers Giovanni Perrone (Protestantism and the Rule of the Faith, La Civiltà Cattolica, Rome 1853, 2 voll.), and Hartmann Grisar (Luther, Herder, Freiburg im Breisgau, 1911/1912, 3 voll.).

But the commemoration of the Lutheran revolt made by the Jesuit journal in October 1917, the fourth centenary marking the 95 theses in Wittenberg, takes on a special meaning.  (Luther and Lutheranism, in La Civiltà Cattolica, IV (1917), pp. 207-233; 421-430). The theologian of La Civiltà Cattolica explained that “The essence of the Lutheran spirit, or rather Lutheranism, is rebellion in all of its extension and in all the force of its word. Rebellion, therefore, which is personified in Luther, was varied and profound, complex and very vast; which apparently appeared but was in fact violent, angry, trivial, obscene and diabolic; deep down it was studied, and directed according to the circumstances, focused on opportunistic ends and interests, intended and wanted with  measured, resolute determination.” (pp.208-309).

Luther, La Civiltà Cattolica continues, “initiated that contemptible parody, with which the rebel monk attributed to God, his ideas, blasphemies and the abominations of his perverted mind: he outraged the Pope in an unspeakable way in the name of Christ, he cursed Caesar in the name of Christ, he blasphemed against the Church, against bishops, against monks with absolute infernal impetuosity, in the name of Christ; he threw his religious habit onto the tree of Judas, in the name of Christ and in the name of Christ he was married sacrilegiously” (p.209). “With the very convenient pretext of following Scripture, as that which alone contains the word of God, he conducted a war on scholastic theology, tradition, canon law, all the institutions and precepts of the Church and councils: in place of these august and venerated things, he, Martin Luther, perjured monk and self-proclaimed doctor, put himself and his authority! Popes, doctors and Holy Fathers were no longer of any worth; the word of Marin Luther was worth more than all of them!  (p.212). The Lutheran theory of justification, in the end, “was born of Luther’s imagination, not by the Gospel or any other word of God revealed to the writers of the New Testament: for us, every Lutheran novelty finds its origins in the concupiscence he stimulated, and in his development of the falsification of Scripture or in formal lying” (p.214

Father Pani cannot deny that the opinion he gives of Luther is a 360 degree turnaround from the one his confreres gave in the same journal, a century ago.  In 1917,  he was censured as an apostate, a rebel, a blasphemer; today he is being praised as a reformer, a prophet, [even] holy. No Hegelian dialectic can harmonize yesterday’s judgment with today’s. Luther was either a heretic who denied some basic dogmas of Christianity, or he was a “witness to faith” who initiated  the Reformation of the Church, brought to completion by the Second Vatican Council and Pope Francis.

In short, every Catholic is called upon to choose whether to side with Pope Francis and the Jesuits of today, or be alongside the Jesuits of yesterday and the Popes of all time.

It is time for choices and to mediate precisely on St. Ignatius’ two standards (Spiritual Exercises, n. 137)* which will help us make them in these difficult times.



*Translator’s note: ”It will be here how Christ calls and wants all under His standard; and Lucifer, on the contrary, under his.” (no. 137, Spiritual Exercises).



Translation: Contributor Francesca Romana



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: francischurch; heresy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-393 next last
To: Luircin

Good question.


61 posted on 11/09/2017 6:16:49 PM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Luircin
Oh, and lest I forget, there’s also the entire thread which started about nothing but insulting all Protestants and all Catholics who don’t reject Francis.

So do you prots accept the Francis? If not, what's your problem with him? Is he too Luther friendly for y'all?

Would you go to one of his "ecumenical masses"? Would you receive Holy Communion at a said "mass"?

62 posted on 11/09/2017 6:18:01 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

I have never called you a Nazi, nor a heretic, nor a demon.

***

You told me that reading Luther was akin to reading Mein Kampf when you proudly refused to do research about what you were talking about.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3601392/posts Post 150. You called me a heretic and that’s why it got deleted.

As for demonic, shall I forget when you accused me of the devil whispering in my ear and having my tongue?

You either have bad memory or you are a liar of the first order. Which is it?


63 posted on 11/09/2017 6:18:13 PM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Once again, you twist my words into something I did not say.

And then you wonder why people call you a liar or a fool.


64 posted on 11/09/2017 6:18:53 PM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Luircin

Oops. My bad.

Post 152, in which you called me a heretic in your final tantrum on that thread.

And then a lesser insult in post 153, which didn’t get deleted.


65 posted on 11/09/2017 6:21:59 PM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Luircin; ebb tide

For that matter, if CATHOLICS don’t have to obey their church leadership, or can pick and choose what or who they want to obey, where do they get off demanding that we have to do at if we want to get to heaven?

Heck, they can’t even agree on which form of Catholicism we need to obey.

So they allow themselves the liberty to believe what they want and what they choose to beleive but do not allow us the same priviledge.

Basically, we’re going to hell for not obeying whatever flavor of Catholicism the Catholic we’re talking to follows.


66 posted on 11/09/2017 6:22:54 PM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
The Paraclete does not guide each and every catholic into every perfect act of faith. Otherwise Catholics would not have the sacrament of Confession.

12“I have many more things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. 13“But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come. 14“He will glorify Me, for He will take of Mine and will disclose it to you. 15“All things that the Father has are Mine; therefore I said that He takes of Mine and will disclose it to you. John 16:12-15 NASB

Do Roman Catholics not read the very book they claim to have given everyone????

67 posted on 11/09/2017 6:25:35 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Luircin; metmom; ealgeone
By the exact same standards that you judge Dr. Luther by, you yourself are an apostate from the Catholic Church.

It's tiresome, yet amusing, seeing non-Catholics tell Catholics, who are and who are not apostates from the Catholic Faith.

It's like the godless muslims telling Christians they are "infidels".

Nothing new in the history of the Church, however.

68 posted on 11/09/2017 6:26:02 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone; ebb tide

What a Catch 22.

Ebb claims he obeys the previous popes, and yet it was one of those previous popes he claims to obey who issued the Unum Sanctum that he is now saying he doesn’t have to obey.


69 posted on 11/09/2017 6:26:09 PM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Ha.

Can’t argue logic so you put your hands over your ears and scream like a 5-year-old.

Funny man, ebb. Funny man.

And you wonder why you don’t get any respect.


70 posted on 11/09/2017 6:27:08 PM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

And finally, lest I forget...

http://freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3600670/posts?page=117#117

There’s just one little example of you playing the Nazi card.

So do you have a painfully bad memory or did you lie?


71 posted on 11/09/2017 6:28:18 PM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

What part of your post above contradicts Confesssion?


72 posted on 11/09/2017 6:29:04 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
So do you prots accept the Francis?

If not, what's your problem with him? Is he too Luther friendly for y'all?

Would you go to one of his "ecumenical masses"?

Would you receive Holy Communion at a said "mass"?

No to all of the above.

The Roman Catholic Mass, where the priest calls Jesus down from Heaven to be placed upon the altar again and again and again....contradicts Scripture.

John O' Brien, Roman Catholic Priest in the Faith of Millions. Hebrews 9:24-28 Hebrews 10:11-13
When the priest pronounces the tremendous words of consecration, he reaches up into the heavens, brings Christ down from His throne, and places Him upon our altar to be offered up again as the Victim for the sins of man. It is a power greater than that of monarchs and emperors: it is greater than that of saints and angels, greater than that of Seraphim and Cherubim. Indeed it is greater even than the power of the Virgin Mary. While the Blessed Virgin was the human agency by which Christ became incarnate a single time, the priest brings Christ down from heaven, and renders Him present on our altar as the eternal Victim for the sins of man—not once but a thousand times! The priest speaks and lo! Christ, the eternal and omnipotent God, bows His head in humble obedience to the priest’s command. 24For Christ did not enter a holy place made with hands, a mere copy of the true one, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us; 25nor was it that He would offer Himself often, as the high priest enters the holy place year by year with blood that is not his own. 26Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now once at the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself. 27And inasmuch as it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment, 28so Christ also, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time for salvation without reference to sin, to those who eagerly await Him. Every priest stands daily ministering and offering time after time the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins; 12but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, SAT DOWN AT THE RIGHT HAND OF GOD, 13waiting from that time onward UNTIL HIS ENEMIES BE MADE A FOOTSTOOL FOR HIS FEET. 14For by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are sanctified.

73 posted on 11/09/2017 6:29:06 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Luircin

I don’t expect respect from the likes of you.

Thanks for the compliment.


74 posted on 11/09/2017 6:30:42 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
What part of your post above contradicts Confesssion?

The better question is where is the Roman Catholic version of "Confession" in Scripture?

The Holy Spirit guides us to confess our sins to Christ Who forgives.

1How blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven, Whose sin is covered!

2How blessed is the man to whom the LORD does not impute iniquity, And in whose spirit there is no deceit!

3When I kept silent about my sin, my body wasted away Through my groaning all day long.

4For day and night Your hand was heavy upon me; My vitality was drained away as with the fever heat of summer. Selah.

5I acknowledged my sin to You, And my iniquity I did not hide; I said, “I will confess my transgressions to the LORD”; And You forgave the guilt of my sin.

Psalms 32:1-5 NASB

75 posted on 11/09/2017 6:34:49 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Luircin; Religion Moderator
And then you wonder why people call you a liar or a fool.

Who is calling me a liar or a fool besides yourself?

Are you trying to avoid the ad hominem forum rules?

76 posted on 11/09/2017 6:37:36 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide; Luircin; ealgeone

What else do you call a Catholic who refuses to submit to the Catholic heirarchy?

You’re the one throwing the term around most.

So we don’t acknowledge the authority of Francis, just like you don’t, and while we are heretics, you are a faithful Catholic.

How exactly does that work? How are you free to reject his authority and no
one else is?


77 posted on 11/09/2017 6:37:40 PM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: metmom
You can't make it up....no, wait. Squirrel!
78 posted on 11/09/2017 6:39:02 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Luircin

You linked to a thread, not a personal post of mine.

How did that thread make you think I personally insulted you?


79 posted on 11/09/2017 6:41:07 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

This one is the best though.

1 John 1:9 If we confess our sins, HE is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and cleanse us from ALL unrighteousness.

No need for a priest, especially one who thinks he can retain someone’s sins when you can just go to God and He PROMISESto forgive. He will override any priests decision to retain sin.


80 posted on 11/09/2017 6:41:47 PM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-393 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson