so you posit that it was latin and Greek people spoke even in Jerusalem that wasn;t true. Why wasn’t;t the eucharist in Greek then. seems like they left out half the people. When did greek get left behind. Do you know that people in the north and eats didn’t ever speak latin unless they were very wealthy and had tutors.
So they went to other countries and islands and spoke only n Greek and latin. is that what you’re saying. they preaching in one language and did the mass sin another. why would they do that. wouldn’t that confuse people who didn’t speak latin or greek. why did God limit this miracle to non-euchartisc ministry.
your position is illogical and nonsensical.
It is generally agreed by historians that Jesus and his disciples primarily spoke Aramaic (Jewish Palestinian Aramaic), the common language of Judea in the first century AD, most likely a Galilean dialect distinguishable from that of Jerusalem.
You are starting out hostile, and distorting what I said so you can make more hostile accusations.
I’m glad you are wiser than all Catholics who lived from 33 A.D. to 1969 A.D. It must be awesome.