Posted on 07/01/2017 5:31:11 PM PDT by marshmallow
TORBAY, Newfoundland, June 30, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) -- A Catholic priest helping to run a gay-Pride multi-faith service says that the Holy Spirit could direct the Church under Pope Francis to change its teaching on marriage and sexuality to accept gay marriage. And, if the Holy Spirit did so, it would be wrong to fight against it, he said.
It's not like this was a teaching that was established in the time of Christ, or in the first three centuries, or by the Council of Nicea, or even by the Council of Trent, said Fr. Paul Lundrigan, a pastor in active ministry at Holy Trinity Parish within the Archdiocese of St. Johns, Newfoundland, to LifeSiteNews.
It was just never considered. Its only in recent centuries there were actions taken, there were things that were said but there was no official teaching written down regarding these issues of sexuality, he added.
Fr. Lundrigan is part of a committee organizing a gay Pride event that will be taking place next month at a Catholic retreat center run by religious sisters within the archdiocese, reported LifeSiteNews earlier this week. He called the pro-gay service an opportunity to come together and not teach doctrine or promote one point of view or another, but to listen and to share faith.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
**Priest Claims Church Could Accept Gay Marriage: It Would be Wrong to Fight Against It**
Wrong!
2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered." They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved. |
Insanity.Or worse.
Celebrate sin, what could go wrong?
The great “falling away” is upon us,
I thought the Book of Romans covered that.
To be logically and morally consistent then, they cannot fight against anything.
So what good are they then? The salt is no longer salty.
Nonsense. Romans 1:18-32. Do “priests” not read the Bible?
“A Catholic ... says that the Holy Spirit could direct the Church under Pope Francis to change its teaching on marriage and sexuality to accept gay marriage. ... It’s not like this was a teaching that was established in the time of Christ, or in the first three centuries, or by the Council of Nicea, or even by the Council of Trent, said Fr. Paul Lundrigan”.
What Bible has this Bozo been reading? Does he mean that Paul’s teachings on homosexuals only applied to single people (since they were too wise in the first century to argue that men could “marry” each other), and if we now pretend that men can “marry” each other, the prohibition on homosexual behavior would not apply to the wedded homosexual couple? That the issue with Paul was only homosexual acts outside of “marriage”?
What are these people smoking?
If he said that, he is a deliberate liar.
10 to 1 says this “priest” is a homosexual predator
He seemed like a truly lovely man. Francis can’t hold a candle to him.
Apparently he doesn’t co.prehend the catechism either.
Yes it has.
18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. 20For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. 21For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures.
24Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them.
25For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
26For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.
28And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, 29being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, 30slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; 32and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them. Romans 1:18-32 NASB
Apostasy.
If the Holy Spirit would do that it would still be wrong. The Holy Spirit cannot do that because it’s against human nature. The reverend doesn’t understand how things work. God cannot make right wrong, because right is not wrong. This is rather elementary, padre.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.