Posted on 05/31/2017 1:41:09 PM PDT by ealgeone
No, Rich, CHRISTIANITY is based on JESUS. Catholiciism shows lots of signs of being based on Nimrod’s origins. But you knew that and still wanted to toss up a strawman/red herring ... that really is stinking and not like you.
Now its the phenomena of the Dancing Baby animation on the old Ally McBeal show that needs deep explanation...I never got that..At...All!
PS: and besides all that....$1.59 and my opinions will get me a cup of coffee at McDonalds. Such is the value of my opinions. I have no illusions otherwise!
1Jn1:8 is very true. Since the audience are believers, it states the situations where believers do sin.
One common denominator of sin, though, is that whenever we sin, we aren’t sinning while in fellowship with Him.
1Jn1:8 is very true. Since the audience are believers, it states the situations where believers do sin.
One common denominator of sin, though, is that whenever we sin, we aren’t sinning while in fellowship with Him.
I would have answered two hours ago, but I had a two hour internet outage. No, I do not think that is a logical conclusion at all. The worship of Nimrod, is a fake, and a counterfeit religion, not Biblical Christianity. For everything that is true, Satan has a counterfeit. Nimrod's religion is not the only false religious system out there. I will leave it to your imagination, to figure out which false religions I am talking about.
Some rites, rituals, holidays, and things, (not all) are brought down from Nimrod's false religion, but then again, I will leave it to your imagination, to figure it out.
Nimrod was a bad dude. I don't know if he intentionally started a false religion, or if he used it as a means to control people. Either way, he was evil. I got no time for him. 🔥
.
Yep, I homed in on it with three posts.
I plan to challenge your record when I get into shape.
.
Of course.
We are not “in fellowship if we are violating any commandment with regularity, but anyone doing that has no need to be admonished; their sin is deliberate, as in Hebrews 6.
Sin, regular or not, deliberate or not, breaks fellowship with God. Heb 6:4-6 refers to rejecting Him at the call.
Most sins (missing the mark) arise from our scarred souls haing faulty thinking processes developed and learned when we were fleshly or worldly. Salvation occurs in an instant. It takes time to sanctify our souls.
Hebrews was written to Hebrews, not to Gentile Christians who might become Jews. It was written to convince the Hebrews of the “better” (the word used prolifically through the book) things in Christ. It was to pull Hebrews over the line into the sufficiency of Christ. It is not a treatise on Christians “losing” their salvation.
This isn’t the time;
for another Elsie rhyme.
No matter how empty you seem.
I just cannot do it;
I’d never get through it.
Humor’s such a difficult theme.
Thank you for that.
I would have answered two hours ago, but I had a two hour internet outage. No, I do not think that is a logical conclusion at all. The worship of Nimrod, is a fake, and a counterfeit religion, not Biblical Christianity. For everything that is true, Satan has a counterfeit. Nimrod’s religion is not the only false religious system out there. I will leave it to your imagination, to figure out which false religions I am talking about.
Some rites, rituals, holidays, and things, (not all) are brought down from Nimrod’s false religion, but then again, I will leave it to your imagination, to figure it out.
Nimrod was a bad dude. I don’t know if he intentionally started a false religion, or if he used it as a means to control people. Either way, he was evil. I got no time for him
It appears that I struck a nerve with my statement. For the record, I do not believe that Christianity is based on Nimrod being God the Father and the reincarnation of Nimrod is Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God.
Nor do I believe that pagans would be allowed to worship Mary in the same way that they worshiped their goddesses. Do you or your Navigators know of any writings from the early church that supports this idea, or that even mentioned Nimrod?
There really isn’t much in the bible on Nimrod other than he was a mighty hunter and apparently rose to the top of the heap by the time the Tower of Babel was conceived of as an idea. We think from educated inferences and from other extra biblical sources he was a pretty bad guy but there isn’t much in the way of info as to how he lived and how he died.
.
Do we believe you, or do we believe the “beloved” apostle John?
I’m going with John, if you don’t mind.
John says that confession fixes the times that we slip up.
>> “Salvation occurs in an instant.” <<
Yes, but according to Yeshua, and Paul, that instant has not come yet; it happens at the Last Trump, in a twinkling of an eye, and judging by present fulfillments of prophecy WRT Jerusalem, it looks like the fall of 2024 is when that instant will come along, so if you’re not dead yet your salvation is dependent upon holding fast in faith.
You’ve already denounced the scriptures that make that plain, so save your keyboard.
.
I think you have it backwards. Biblical Christianity is not based on the worship of Nimrod. It is the other way around. The worship of Nimrod is a bastardization of the truth of Biblical Christianity.
As far as the Navs go, there are so many people affiliated with them, who have written so many different books and works, that I can't possibly keep track of them all, so I don't know for sure. I know there are lots of sources out there. The Nav motto, is to know Christ, and to make him known, so their authors probably concentrate on other issues. I would say, it's not bad for an old lumber yard worker. 😀👍 Later bro.
The worship of Nimrod is a bastardization of the truth of Biblical Christianity.
So going back to post 604, where you wrote,
Do you suppose this worship or veneration of Mary, whatever they want to call it, is part of the paganism that was added, to attract pagans to the church? Is it related to Diana of the Ephesians? Doesn’t all this paganism originate with the worship of Nimrod and his wife? Didn’t the queen of Heaven thing originate with her, and after Nimrod’s death, didn’t she claim to give birth to a reincarnation of Nimrod? I believe this is paganism with a capital P, and was possibly brought into the church, to make pagans feel welcome.
Do you know of any writings from the early church that supports your assertion that this paganism was brought into the church? Or that even mentioned any pagan religions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.