I think you have it backwards. Biblical Christianity is not based on the worship of Nimrod. It is the other way around. The worship of Nimrod is a bastardization of the truth of Biblical Christianity.
As far as the Navs go, there are so many people affiliated with them, who have written so many different books and works, that I can't possibly keep track of them all, so I don't know for sure. I know there are lots of sources out there. The Nav motto, is to know Christ, and to make him known, so their authors probably concentrate on other issues. I would say, it's not bad for an old lumber yard worker. 😀👍 Later bro.
The worship of Nimrod is a bastardization of the truth of Biblical Christianity.
So going back to post 604, where you wrote,
Do you suppose this worship or veneration of Mary, whatever they want to call it, is part of the paganism that was added, to attract pagans to the church? Is it related to Diana of the Ephesians? Doesn’t all this paganism originate with the worship of Nimrod and his wife? Didn’t the queen of Heaven thing originate with her, and after Nimrod’s death, didn’t she claim to give birth to a reincarnation of Nimrod? I believe this is paganism with a capital P, and was possibly brought into the church, to make pagans feel welcome.
Do you know of any writings from the early church that supports your assertion that this paganism was brought into the church? Or that even mentioned any pagan religions?