Did I write that? I certainly did not, nor did I imply it, nor did I think it.
I do wish you're quit imputing to me what I did not say. It unfairly puts me int he position of having to refute things I never said to begin with.
We'd both learn a lot more, I think, and appreciate each other better,if we would ASK the other person what they believe, rather than TELL them what they believe.
The only thing you can really confidently TELL, is what YOU believe. It would be more pro
You are exposed, once again. Which face will we get in response this time?
OK; I will.
Could you please explain WHY you left off the verses leading up to the one you posted?
It CLEARLY shows that 'listening to the church' is intended for a dispute between believers.
Posting the verse along with the reply you made...
People who dont appreciate hierarchy wont appreciate the Book of Acts or the Epistles, where we see the basic hierarchy of diaconoi - presbyteroi-episcopoi being established by the calling of select men and the laying on of hands; and, as Fr. Popes article points out, the calling of authoritative councils and synods.
Tagline, from Matthew a direct quote from Jesus.
...shows something quite different than what you are trying to explain away here:
The verse about listening to the church in no way establishes it as an ultimate hierarchical system that Rome has become."
Did I write that? I certainly did not, nor did I imply it, nor did I think it.