[omegatoo]

Luke 1:31
“Behold thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and shalt bring forth a son; and thou shalt call his name Jesus.”

“Thou shalt conceive”

Mary is not the passive actor here, she actively participated in the action of conception, just as she actively participated in delivering Him into the world.

The scripture above proves the ‘unproveable assertion’.

In the event that you choose to disregard scripture and consider Mary to be a surrogate mother, she is still a mother, without whom Jesus’s body would not have been formed from the nutrients provided by her, her blood mixing with His during the time she carried Him.

So, sorry, she’s still the mother of God by virtue of having given birth to Him, genetically or not is really not important.

Also, if Mary is not related genetically to Jesus, and Joseph is not related genetically to Jesus, then Jesus could not possibly have had any true brothers and sisters, could He?

Love,
O2

.....SAVE THE SERVERS....TAGLINE.....

[MHGinTN]

Conceive in her womb ... the zygote is conceived by the womb when the morulla implants in the uterine lining. You can be excused for ignorance, but purposeful false assertions will be challenged.

[MHGinTN]

BTW, the morulla implants without the mother doing anything except remaining alive, so the false assertion that Mary was an active participant is rejected, too: "Mary is not the passive actor here, she actively participated in the action of conception." O₂

[MHGinTN]

You need more education before making a statement like the following, which is totally in error: “... her blood mixing with His during the time she carried Him.” Again, your ignorance can be excused, but not purposed errors.

[Elsie]

Mary is not the passive actor here, she actively participated in the action of conception, just as she actively participated in delivering Him into the world.

Now THERE is a mental image that Rome has tried SO hard to erase!!