Replies

You’re gonna be audited!

Is that en e-meter in your pocket, or are you just happy to have opportunity to joke around about serious things, trying to get people to ---- what more exactly are you trying to get done? Get them to think? Think what?

I'll be audited [eventually -- of course]. Including over being facetious in comment 484. But you weren't exactly intending to imply that(?) although we can all assume we will be brought into account for each idle word...for it is written that we shall.

I was hoping to express ---that all of 484--- was opposite of what we should do.

Best intentions are still not good enough to set aside (and be put in place of) what's Holy, though. There's always that...

I'd just written too, to another person on how demonic forces have no creative abilities, so can only mock and imitate ---and there I was, mocking. Yet, I wasn't mocking Holiness...

I was mocking what seems to me to have been set in it's place, and called 'holy', but is only that on best of days, and among humble personages ---other than the One who truly is capital H, Holy, that is. Where He may be among them, there could be (would be?) holiness found, I surely would like to think.

I will be audited though, someday, by the Lord (even more so than as I go along here in earthly life existence, for He does examine me even now). In our futures, when we finally meet Him face to face, we all will be thoroughly examined. All I have to plead is the blood of Jesus. How's that for an audit? That blood better be found on me, eh?

Pockets full of e-meters won't clear the customs office upstairs. Sorry Scientologists. You won't be flying no F-14's, or no 707's (even if you have, or once had a pair) up those final stairs. Not those.

Here still downstairs as it were, prior to the final visit to The Office, what do we do to busy and amuse ourselves> More inventory taking, more audits. Will this tending to the accounts never end?

Will be audited ---but no STOOPID e-meters--- and not on the grounds of, an audit of "the books" a Mr. Jerk Inquisitor (as seen also here, and here) was thinking he could audit for me as if he was doing the greatest service, a holy work. It was Crusade.

After some amount of continuing unreasonable intransigence on his part in this (his attempt to audit me-- which was also in part, deflection away from complaints about his own previous rudeness -- there's that audit thingy again) I turned the tables, and the Inquisitor ended up being audited, himself... right out in front of God and everybody.
Ok, all 39 everybody or less everybodies? who read through, and followed the that long, drawn out and torturous conversation.

What this was also about, that was going chiefly unsaid, is that in addition to the aspect of there having been contention over corporeal presence (of the 'body' of Christ) in the bread of communion (the physical bread itself, that is ordinary bread until it ceases to be bread at all ---according to RC assertions, anyhow) is the idea that has been implanted among Romanists that their 'Church' is The Body.

I deny that. Yet wasn't being openly "audited" and tried upon those grounds, although that was what was in the heart and mind of Mr. Jerk -- clearly enough for me to see. No mind-reading necessary.

I deny that; that ecclesiastical organization is God Incarnate upon the earth (any more than other Christians both are, and ARE NOT --at the same time, if that makes any sense) and so was allegedly denying the Incarnation and Resurrection of Christ more fundamentally

they say so

over my having attempted to speak towards what the Lord *Jesus Christ's* "body" would be now, after his Ascension & Glorification, venturing that it not be just as any entirely human body as we more typically would think of and understand those to be. Somehow, just going that far, according to the serial antagonist, equated with myself having fully denied that which I had otherwise affirmed. I'm sorry, but it just did not ~work~ with me.

The man had gone so far in the false accusation department, he had at one point compared myself to the Cathars, the kind that the Church of Rome had centuries ago slaughtered by the thousands, in some instances seizing those persons entire towns and villages, distributing the property among the RCC, those who had done the dirty work for the RCC, and the prelates of that same ecclesiastical "body".

I took offense. The entire program/crusade against me was dirty, despicable, deceitful attempt to read into inventory things I do not possess, then judge and condemn me on strength of continually repeated false accusations.

The one who perpetrated such acts (of accusing another -- me that is) is the one who's more truly in darkness than I am, and appears to me to be trying to drag people away into it. Misery loves company? Going over land and sea to win a proselyte only to make them twice the child of hell those who embark upon such journeys are? (Matthew 23:15). If what I am doing here is working at supplying basis for having second thoughts for anyone contemplating "converting" to Catholicism, the antagonist was being the best guy on my team(?).

I can say that without running afoul of the Book of James, and of being unkind, and unloving --I think. I've already said it. Too late now...

If you had, or have any problems with me about this, please, tell me what those are plainly so I need not guess towards intended meanings. Could you do that, I mean, do "it" that way, if you were to have something further you'd think I need to know and consider?