Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o

Well, isn’t the ex cathedra statements only what’s formally binding on Catholics or not?

If it’s not formally binding, then they do have the choice to accept it or not. Right?


36 posted on 04/08/2017 5:08:37 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
If it’s not formally binding, then they do have the choice to accept it or not. Right?

Hey!

I ain't so dang smart to figger if this stuff is BINDING or not; so, to be on the SAFE side, I'll jus accept it all!!

Catholic_Wannabe_Dude(Hail Mary!!)

41 posted on 04/08/2017 5:23:11 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: metmom
Well, isn’t the ex cathedra statements only what’s formally binding on Catholics or not?

Of course that's not "only what's formally binding". The doctrinal teachings of ecumenical councils are all infallible, but those aren't Papal ex cathedra statements.

And it's false to assert that only infallibly proclaimed teachings are binding in conscience. Infallibly proclaimed teachings are things that can't be changed.

We were, however, specifically addressing the claim that most things a Pope says are, or are supposed to be, protected by the charism of Papal infallibility. That claim is also not true.

45 posted on 04/08/2017 5:30:13 AM PDT by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson