Replies

“In other words you can’t explain how you’re attempting to use Scripture to justify your tagline. Got it.”

No. First of all, I didn’t attempt to use Scripture to justify my tagline. I used Scripture to justify my tagline. There was no attempt. There was only accomplishment. Second, I could explain further but I see no point in doing so for three reasons: 1) I’m not at your beck and call and that post wasn’t to you in the first place. 2) It’s obvious and no further explanation should be necessary. 3) I can only conclude that this is yet another example of an anti-Catholic’s line of questioning with no serious point but to endlessly post about a non-point in desperate search of something to attack a Catholic over. If this goes as it usually does, an anti-Catholic will either 1) keep posting endlessly about how I won’t reply to him in a way he wishes (and his posts will be ever increasingly plaintive ones) or 2) the anti-Catholic will pull the almost classic taking-my-ball-and-going-home nonsense.

I just assume post how I want to post, when I want to post, about what I want to post, and I don’t care if it bothers the anti-Catholic. All I have to do is follow the board rules, of course.

Of course ealgeone can rightfully respond to you on this. You are addressing that tagline insult to ealgeone as much as you are to everyone else. And ealgeone is correctly saying that you attempted to justify it through Scripture but haven’t done so. What’s more, you’ve not only made your tagline a personal attack on everyone who reads it, but you’re breaking the rules by calling an individual poster an “anti-Catholic.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/~religionmoderator/