[G Larry]

Yes, and the abuses were addressed in the Council of Trent.

ALL of Luther’s theological points were rejected.

[MortMan]

ALL of Luther’s theological points were rejected.

Please explain the difference between this and when a politician denies an opponent's allegations?

Basically, your answer amounts to the fact that the people he challenged denied that the challenges were valid. Ergo, anyone who wishes to debate the point now must accede that the challenges were invalid, because the people being challenged disagreed.

What is most amusing to me is that the question I posed elicited one form of the exact answer I expected, rather than trying to spark an actual debate.

Have a great day, FRiend.

[Elsie]

ALL of Luther’s theological points were rejected.

LOh?

Then can you explain the reasoning behind the creation of the COUNTER Reformation?