He did. Did what? "included them"? I am apprised of that, and had written as much, yet those extra books being included with what was eventually delivered still do not make those extra books into being fully Scripture, comparable on one-to one basis equivalency as towards contents of what could be referred to as Jewish Bible (Tanakh).
I perused the first link supplied from an earlier comment you had posted. I've seen that one before too. It's the same old massaging of details, and obscuring of details not convenient to whatever marginal arguments Matt1618, yourself and other here are attempting to make.
I think I've seen Taylor Marshall's specious arguments on this previously -- they're recycled from elsewhere anyway, and truly don't have further time for that guy. He's shallow in regards to many other items of Roman Catholic aplogetic, his arguments easily enough refuted in ending result, once one works through all the usual tangles.
The same probably goes for "Shameless Popery".
I get the idea you are trying to waste my time, trying to get me to focus upon argument you prefer, while yourself refusing to adequately deal with what does refute your own (and many other of the usual RCC apologetic claims) or else just using reply to me as platform for further advertisement of RC apologetic brainwashing
You have no standing with me, to require such a thing, that I dig into those links to "deeply consider" whatever is assembled there. Not you. For you've not shown much effort on your own part to deal in even-handed manner with most anything which goes against whatever arguments you may care to make.
“He did. Did what? “included them”?”
If you can’t keep up, you have other issues to think about.