Spare me the insult promo. You know that's not true. Or at least should know.
That's some beef I had nothing to do with, nor would raise any challenges whatsoever to anything which I DID say. I think I see here another of your games. Distract distract distract is the name of this one.
Pathetic. I had not entered into discussing or else supporting anything that you are trying to gin up fairy tail that I did.
The points I did write about where separate issues, and you should know that ---unless it is yourself who has reading comprehension "issues", this time quite possibly (since I'm feeling generous) yourself having read into what I had said, something which I had not.
If that is not the case, this would be doubly insulting. Lies piled on lies. I guess all you have left is attempt to anger your opponents. What a loser you are, vladi. Whats the matter? Are you seeking to get the thread locked down, or better yet "deleted" since you guys have suffered such a serious stomping of RCC apologetic regarding canonical issues in light of the typical sort of 'Catholic' massaging of the historical details in order to oh, so carefully shift things around to be in your favor?
You wrote: “That’s some beef I had nothing to do with, nor would raise any challenges whatsoever to anything which I DID say.”
I had posted - and you quoted and then responded to: “A claim was made that is directly refuted by the very existence of certain texts in the Dead Sea Scrolls. It’s just that simple.”
And your response was: “The very existence? Not hardly, as I pointed out, and did take some effort to explain just why. Obviously enough you cannot refute my own grounds of refutation of this claim you are making.”
Remember, “The very existence? Not hardly...” Clearly, if the Deuterocanonicals are in the Dead Sea Scrolls, then Origen didn’t write them nor did Eusebius. It’s just that simple. And just as I noted previously, “Nothing you posted in any way overturned what I said. A claim was made that is directly refuted by the very existence of certain texts in the Dead Sea Scrolls. It’s just that simple.”
What I posted was true. Iscool was wrong and you were wrong to say, “The very existence? Not hardly...”