[bray]

After 200 years you would think they would have found some actual proof of evolution. Where is the fossil record?

[DWW1990]

Better still: where are the “transitional” species?

[heterosupremacist]

#17 bray wrote: Darwin readily admitted that no geological evidence existed that would lend credence to his 'theory'. If such creatures existed, where are their fossilized remains? In over one hundred fifty years, the scientific community has NOT uncovered evidence of the missing link.. Yet MANY scientists have tried to hoax us with 'irrefutable proof' ... which they all claimed was 'skeletal evidence' of Darwinism, and its ridiculous claims!