[TXnMA]

In fact, I have (here on FR) explained my theory that the image on the cloth could correlate very well with the energy emission from a human body's surface -- at the instant of resurrection and transformation. (I did lengthy [successful] research on transferring micro-patterned materials from one surface to another -- using nothing but the energy from a near-istantaneous burst of light. It works -- with great fidelity of replication.)

My problem with the SoT is that -- so far --no competent group of scientific authorities have produced any reports actually tying it to the timeframe of the resurrection and transformation of Christ. There are interesting bits and pieces -- but there is a huge mountain of conflicting flummery and misinformation.

My problem with the premise of this thread is the imbecilic leap of "VOILA!" logic connecting those supposed magnetic anomalies in a piece of stone to the plausible effect (at the far, opposite end of the elecromagnetic energy spectrum) that could have involved sufficient, instant energy release to have formed the "flash-sublimation transfer" image on the shroud.

The statement in the article was one of (misplaced) faith multiplied by scientific ignorance -- NOT any evidence of scientific relationship -- much less correlation.

Bottom line: Stupid, ignorant, pseudoscientific article.

[agere_contra]

Oh right, sorry, you were reacting to the article.

I agree: a mere magnetic anomaly is hardly a compelling argument.