[ebb tide]

Full title:

Look at Oscar Eduardo Miñarro - a new Bergoglian Bishop from Buenos Aires - believes embryos are not life and approves of "gay marriage!"

[Buckeye McFrog]

A Bishop who does not believe in Absolute Truth.
Swell.

[ebb tide]

Bergoglian Bishop, Oscar Eduardo Minarro

[pepsi_junkie]

I was raised a catholic. I don't say "I go to a catholic church" or "I'm a member of the roman catholic church". I say I am a Catholic. It's part of my identity. The Church has always been far from perfect but it was MY Church and I would stick with it come what may. Not blindly, certainly, where it needed to do better I would raise my voice but from within the Church. Always within.

It was pretty easy under John Paul II, frankly. But these leftists who have now taken over the church are breaking me. I feel like the leadership doesn't have any faith, that it's all about politics to them. And it leaves me feeling adrift.

[Albion Wilde]

This idiot thinks that turkey-baster children deprived of natural parents are OK.

[miss marmelstein]

He’s simply not a Catholic. That is not Catholic teaching, it’s pure heresy.

[MHGinTN]

Signs of the end times are accumulating ... up is down, black is white, wrong is right, evil is good.

[vinny29]

He is a CINO-Catholic in name only-

[TexasFreeper2009]

so.. embryo’s are not life... so... if we found a martian embryo on mars... the headlines wouldn’t be screaming

Life Found on Mars!

?

[opus1]

Of all the poppycock I’ve heard from priests for many decades, this statement about ‘embryos’ is the most unsettling. We’ve all heard priests who are soft on abortion because they sympathize with the plight of an unwed mother. But never have I heard a priest actually declare an ‘embryo’ is not human, nor perhaps even alive! That defining life is not a biological question, but purely a philosophical one!

I really cannot take this on face value, it’s too incredible and unprecedented. Where is the source for this quotation? What was the context, the year, was it an interview or what? Was he bishop or priest at the time? Could there be a translation problem? Or incorrect reporting? It does appear to be out of context of a larger discourse?

This is unlike anything yet out of the Bergoglio reign. The Church is almost fully secularized, but I’ve never heard this line of reasoning. To follow it is to lose the dogma of Transubstantiation! So, that’s why I’m wondering about the source, not to cast doubt on your post.

[Sgt_Schultze]

So to be clear, for over 2,000 years, the morons before him were truly rubes. So can I take communion today if I sinned grievously and haven’t repented? What about divorce - can they come back to the Church and remarry? How could those rubes be right about anything?