Muslim Disrupts Peaceful Rosary Prayer, Finds Not All Catholics Are Pushovers

madworldnews ^ | August 31, 2016 | Dom the Conservative

[Morgana]

As a group of Catholics was peacefully praying in protest of the closure of a local church, a Muslim man walked up and began blaring his music to disrupt the prayer. After one man stood up from praying the rosary, the Muslim thug instantly realized that not all Christians are intimidated by Islamic bullying tactics.

In Sharia countries, religious minorities are denied basic rights and often fear for their lives if they do not adhere to Islamic laws and customs. In the West, the Muslim minority still intimidates and persecutes the benevolent Christian majority that’s fought to protect the laws that offer such tyrannical ideologies tolerance. In the end, the more aggressive Islam overtakes the peace-seeking cultures and spreads its violent, oppressive governance throughout the country until Sharia is finally implemented in full.

Fortunately, there are still a few who are willing to stop at nothing to defend their religious freedoms from those who would outlaw them. Of course, once these peaceful non-Muslims stop allowing their tolerance to be exploited and start fighting back, the hostile Muslim minority doesn’t seem to like it so much.

*****video on link****

[Noumenon]

Indeed. But he got clocked hard and fell hard. Wonder how much he’ll remember. “Allahu AkSPLAT!”

[Noumenon]

Muslims never shake hands or hand anything with the left hand and they despise people who are left handed.

Yes - it has to do with what passes for their toilet habits.

[Noumenon]

We also need more like Jean Parisot de Valette He spoke the only language that Islamic scum understand. Great story. Told in a uh, more vernacular style at the link.

[Noumenon]

Time to stand up. If you’re not willing to do so, then stand aside let better men and women than you do so. This is way overdue.

[ConservativeMind]

I have absolutely no problems “standing up,” but this reaction was foolish and would not be worth going to jail over.

There are plenty of occasions worth that, but this was not justified.

[aquila48]

Time to man the new crusades. The first one should be against our vile, leftist politicians and their propaganda organs that have opened the doors and put out the welcome mat for the invaders. The second against the invaders themselves.

[tumblindice]

“I dare you to taunt me a second time, ha ha, ho ho!”
French knight

[dp0622]

As a former boxer I would say two things.

It wasn’t a “neat” punch.

It was, however, a BRUTALLY FAST, DEVASTATINGLY powerful punch and you do not want to FIGHT a guy like this, because he likely would keep getting up no matter what you hit him with!!!

VERY fast punch. Tremendous strength!! Very fun to watch :)

[jobim]

If this video is all we have to go on, how can all of you justify a knock-out punch
to a guy merely walking up to a group praying the Rosary?

He does not represent Islam; he is not a stand in for ISIS. He is an individual, and
as such, he must be treated according to his behavior. Even if his music is loud
(which I cannot hear on the video), this in no way warrants a violent response.

I am no snowflake. I stand outside a place of abortions multiple times per week,
and interact with all kinds and all dispositions. Imagine if I were to use violence
every time a person attempted to disrupt my vigil.

Every single comment, save one, disagreed with me. When are we permitted to
react with violence? When we are physically threatened. Can any of you make
the case that these prayerful folks were physically threatened? Maybe there is
another video. But with what we have, how can any one of you justify this?

[dp0622]

I’ll be up all night worried.

[dp0622]

It’s GREAT that you stand outside of abortion places, but comparing that to the dangers of confronting muslims or being threatened by them (they’re into the beheading, burning alive, sawing in half things) is APPLES and ORANGES.

[jobim]

I'll give this one more try with you. He is an individual.
There is nothing to indicate he has perpetrated those atrocities
of ISIS. He is not moving toward those Rosary participants
with a plan to enact any of the ISIS atrocities on them. What
gives the fellow the right to use violence on him?

[knarf]

I'll agree you believe you have a justified argument.

I also agree that France just may have had enough and the least little perceived provocation is to them, justification.

Neither you, I nor any of the other commenters are subject to the everyday subliminal ... or overt ... ever present elements of islam that has them as tender as you are towards abortion.

The violence you protest is silent and hidden ... theirs is in their face and a man with testosterone is to be applauded, no matter how seemingly extra violent or out of place it may seem to the eye of a foreigner.

[Palio di Siena]

what gives him the right to use violence is the intentional disrespect shown to those peacefully praying.

[Ann Archy]

OMG!! THAT says it all!!!! Put that on every thread!!

[Mark17]

The chump WAS moving toward them, and from behind them. There may have been something going on previously, that we never saw, because that white guy was up and on him, in a second. So, I am thinking that wasn't the first time they ever saw that dude. Maybe he threatened them. We just don't know for sure. You notice no one else got socked up.
I will always give a Catholic the benefit of the doubt, in a scrap with a Muzzie.

[FreedomPoster]

That site is my go-to whenever I feel someone needs to know of the fine work of Simo Häyhä.

[trebb]

Are you saying that the knock-out punch was justified? I am puzzled. Whether he was BLM, or Muslim, or ghetto thug, or obnoxious anti-Christian, if this is all there is, what is shown, how is that a right response?

Sometimes God was more angry at those who refused to totally wipe out His chosen target......

[trenton1776]

“I hate rude behavior in a man. I won’t tolerate it.” Woodrow Call in Lonesome Dove.

[ConservativeMind]

So, butchering people ten feet away behind a wall is not a murderous concern, but a man, not threatening to touch anyone, deserves to be clobbered and have his head smack the pavement?