Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xone

CI is ‘tickled ears’ doctrine, SDA in particular. It isn’t biblical.


I’m not SDA. I’m not JW. But I have actually read the bible and studied it. That is what actually brought me to CI. I’ve offered sources here. More and more people are getting their pastors to study it themselves. Once people are exposed to the full picture, minds are changed.

I’ve actually read papers and watched videos from all sides of this issue before solidifying my viewpoint. Have you? To not do so is, by definition, dogmatism.

It is also adherence to “the traditions of men”.


33 posted on 08/30/2016 4:16:47 PM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Douglas
To not do so is, by definition, dogmatism. It is also adherence to “the traditions of men”.

Nothing wrong with Biblical dogmatism. That would make it by definition not a tradition of man. CI is an effort to minimize the cost of sin and by extension minimize the Lord's sacrificial atonement for that sin. The Bible is plain as to the final place for those who have not believed. Same place as the Devil and his angels.

34 posted on 08/30/2016 5:54:34 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Douglas
But I have actually read the bible and studied it.

Daniel 12:2
Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt.

41 posted on 08/31/2016 4:03:49 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson