In this brief article, Fr. Anthony expresses with clarity the truth of the false teaching known as the “Rapture” and how much it distorts the teachings of the Lord in the Holy Scriptures.Posted on 07/27/2016 8:46:41 PM PDT by NRx
By Fr. Anthony M. Coniaris
In this brief article, Fr. Anthony expresses with clarity the truth of the false teaching known as the “Rapture” and how much it distorts the teachings of the Lord in the Holy Scriptures.
As I was driving one day I encountered a bumper sticker admonishing me:
“WARNING! In the event of Rapture, this car will be driverless.”
The strange belief in the Rapture teaches that some day (sooner rather than later), without warning, born-again Christians will begin to float up from the freeway, abandoned vehicles careening wildly. There will be airliners in the sky suddenly with no one at the controls! Presumably, God is removing these favored ones from earth to spare them the tribulation of the Anti-Christ which the rest of us will have to endure.
Unfortunately the Rapture has been promoted widely by the Left Behind series of books that have sold over 70 million copies.
The Rapture represents a radical misinterpretation of Scripture. I remember watching “Sixty Minutes”a year ago and was appalled to hear the announcer say that “the Rapture is an unmistakenly Christian doctrine”. It is not!
It is a serious distortion of Scripture.
It is astonishing that a belief so contrary to Scripture and the tradition of the Church could be propagated by so-called “Christians”.
According to the Bible and according to the belief not only of Orthodox Christians but also of the Roman Catholic and most Protestant mainline churches, the true Rapture will not be secret; it will be the great and very visible Second Coming of Jesus at the end of the world. That is the one and only “Rapture”. It will not be a separate, secret event but one that every eye shall see (1 Thess. 4:16-17).
The word rapture is not found in Scripture but hearkens to 1 Thess. 4:17 where St. Paul says that when the Lord comes again
“we who are alive…shall be caught up…in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air.”
This “being caught up…in the clouds”—arpagisometha in Greek, is translated by some as “raptured”. The word itself is not found in Orthodox theology.
The notion of a rapture in which Christ comes unseen to take believers away secretly, and only later comes back again for everyone else publicly—this whole teaching is quite novel. It was almost unheard of until John Nelson Darby formulated it in the 1800s as part of a new approach to the Bible, sometimes called “dispensationalism”.
The purpose of the “Rapture” is to protect the elect from the tribulations of the end times. Yet Jesus said nothing about sparing anyone from tribulation. In fact, He said,
“In the world you have tribulation, but be of good cheer. I have overcome the world.”
Nowhere did Jesus ever say that He would return secretly to rapture the elect. Rather, He promised to be with His elect in all tribulations.
“Lo, I am with you always. I will never leave you or forsake you.”
He even had something good to say about being persecuted:
“Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 5:10).
Those who espouse the Rapture claim that Matthew 24:40-41 refers clearly to the rapture of the just,
“Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.”
The entire passage, however, refers to Christ’s second coming where He will judge the living and the dead and separate the just from the unjust.
Darby taught as dogma that when the Scriptures reveal that the Lord will reign on earth for a thousand years (Rev. 20:4), this figure is to be taken literally, rather than as a symbol for eternity as we believe. The Council of Ephesus in A.D. 431 condemned as heresy this teaching which is called chialiasmos (millenianism or 1000 years).
In fact, the Seven Ecumenical Councils (325-787 A.D.) in which the essential truths of the Christian faith were defined never mention a rapture. Yet evangelical Christians and Pentecostals keep using obscure passages of the book of Revelation which purport to give a detailed timetable of what will happen at the end of the world, despite the fact that Jesus Himself warned that no man knows either the day or the hour when the Son of Man shall return.
A major problem with the Rapture is that it ends up teaching not two but three comings of Jesus—first His birth in Bethlehem; second, His secret coming to snatch away (rapture) the “born-again”; and third, His coming at the end of the world to judge the living and the dead and to reign in glory. Yet only two not three comings of Christ are mentioned in the Bible. We have the clearest definition of this in the Nicene Creed when we confess that
“the Lord Jesus Christ…will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead. His Kingdom will have no end…. I expect the resurrection of the dead. And the life of the ages to come.”
There is no mention of a “Rapture”.
As already stated, most Christians, Orthodox, Roman Catholics and Protestants do not believe in the Rapture. In fact, one Protestant pastor, John L. Bray, summarized magnificently what we Orthodox and most other Christians believe about the Rapture when he wrote these remarkable words,
Though many believe and teach this “Pre-Tribulation Rapture” theory, they erroneously do so, because neither Jesus, Paul, Peter, John, nor any of the other writers of the Bible taught this. Nor did the early church fathers, nor any others for many hundreds of years…. Did you know that NONE of this was ever taught prior to 1812, and that all forms of Pre-Tribulation Rapture teaching were developed since that date? …. If I were to preach something, or believe something, supposedly from the Bible, but cannot find that ANYONE ELSE before 1812 ever believed it or taught it, I would seriously question that it is based on the Bible.
Thus the Rapture is foreign to the Bible and to the living tradition of the Church. It is what we call a heresy, a false teaching. False teachings, such as this, happen when people—like John Darby—believe that they have the right to interpret the Scriptures individually apart from the Living Body of Christ—the Church—where the Spirit of Truth abides and leads us to all truth.
I can think of no better words to conclude than those of Jesus when He speaks of the one and only “Rapture”, the Second Coming:
“Be on guard. Be alert! You do not know when that time will come…keep watch…if he comes suddenly, do not let Him find you sleeping. What I say to you, I say to everyone: Watch!” (Mark 13:32-37).
Would it be Christian to correct someone with contempt? That's what I'm taking about. And if a Christian can't withhold the contempt, should they change themselves, or just call it tough love and rip someone to shreds while hiding behind the truth? Guess which is most common?
Yes.
[Ok, lets say they didn’t accept the gift. So why not try to ease their suffering as best you can, considering?]
JESUS CHRIST gave His all when He suffered and died on the Cross of Calvary. He died so no one has to suffer and spend an eternity in Hell.
Hell is real. Worry about that!
Dude, I don’t know what “Christians” you hang around, but you seriously need to change churches.
“Creating “Rapture Survival Kits” for the unsaved is not what we are called to do.”
This is hard for me to understand. Why can’t you just do both and cover your bases? I mean if there were foundations and charities don’t you think folks would at the very least give it a second look?
Freegards
I think most liberals hate Christians because it’s hard to see someone taking the hard way, and they know they took the easy way.
At least in this life.
Freegards
Anyone can attend a church and fulfill social obligations. The true church is in the heart - and many heartless people attend churches. Aii I'm talking about is HOW teachings are done. Everyone sins, but many people sin by crippling the hearts of sinners by bashing them with the truth. Instead of leading people to Christ, they lead them to self-loathing and self-hatred. If Jesus had taken such a harsh approach, He'd have had no disciples.
I already explained why I am asking questions in this thread. I am not worried about anything.
Freegards
Read Revelation. It only takes a couple of hours. The NIV Live tapes are excellent. Suffering as we know it does not even begin to describe what is going to happen in the last days to those who don’t believe . .so the best thing is to spread the Word to those you know now before it is too late. God is in control. 2 Peter 3:9 “The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.”
Why would they take the easy way, if Christ could fulfill them? Answer: because they never met Christ.
And here's an answer to your question, "Why do liberals hate Christians?" One word, accountability.
It is ignorant to not accept what He has provided in Scripture.
Do Christians have any humane obligation to those who never met Christ, if they believe in the Rapture and believe they are saved and will be raptured?
Freegards
I see your heart, Ransomed, and the basis of it in Christ's 2nd commandment. Peace to you. I'll bet you are really involved in local missions.
Thea an absolute epidemic of liberals in this country. They've all replaced God with the government. And they all hate Christians. If Christians were properly teaching, I don't think there'd be this big of a problem. Yeah, some would knowingly choose evil, but my God, we've got over 40 MILLION liberals determined to vote for Hillary no matter what. When the failure rate is that high, maybe, just maybe, the teaching isn't being done right.
It has nothing to do with changing the teaching, but how its being taught. And Jesus Himself warned to put love above all - and liberals uniformly live in loveless agony. So somehow they're not getting the message and feeling the Divine love that's available for them. THAT'S the REAL problem in America. The Democratic Party is just the organization of all those lost souls into voting blocks.
It has to be done with love, not contempt. To me, that's the essence of the teaching, because then Christ acts through the love, rather than the ego of whoever is trying to teach. That's all, except generally the tougher the teaching, the gentler it needs to be in order to be heard.
People vastly overestimate the inner strength of sinners. Sinners are SCARED. And like a wild animal can be spooked very easily. So what matters is if you actually care what happens to them, or not.
Why would there be an obligation towards someone who already met Christ? They're safe. The only possible "obligation" would be towards those who HAVEN'T met Christ.
For a denominaton that teaches purgatory, also not a word or translation found in the bible and talked about nowhere in official canon books, kinda log in the eye removal time.
In my hypothetical question, the Christians are the ones who believe in the Rapture. As in is it reasonable to expect some sort of posthumous planning for the ones left behind?
Freegards
Interesting article and good comments. The Rapture is a term of popular culture that is fun to discuss while talking in the mountains in front of the camp fire and sipping whiskey. The Lord is King and He alone knows.
It is funny how Jehovah Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists and a bunch of other gnostics have publicly stated the dates of the Rapture. Sadly, all have been incorrect. I had a friend in Berkeley who went to Independence, Missouri to prepare for the rapture that would take place and he was hurrying to go before it happened sometime in 1997. Yikes! Don’t miss out!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.