Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/27/2016 7:09:11 PM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ebb tide

As a Lutheran, I almost wish the Holy Father were a Lutheran, because then he would not be spewing so much heterodox drivel, along with too many of his bishops.


2 posted on 06/27/2016 7:28:28 PM PDT by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

A lutheran wouldn’t want to be pope.


3 posted on 06/27/2016 7:37:33 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

It is weird. He sounds Evangelical. How many churches are there? One, FReinds.


5 posted on 06/27/2016 7:40:25 PM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

The Lutherans are welcome to him (if they can bear to accept someone as devoid of integrity as he has revealed himself to be).


6 posted on 06/27/2016 7:51:43 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

“A Lutheran Cannot be Pope.”

But a Pope named Francis can be a declared Muslim given enough time.


7 posted on 06/27/2016 8:11:11 PM PDT by pleasenotcalifornia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

The pope is talking about the October, 1998 agreed statement on justification between the Lutheran World Federation
and the Catholic Church. It doesn’t surprise me that there are people too dumb or mendacious to simply tell that truth.

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/documents/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_31101999_cath-luth-official-statement_en.html


8 posted on 06/27/2016 8:21:58 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

If a marxist homosexual can be Pope then why can’t a Lutheran?


9 posted on 06/27/2016 8:23:33 PM PDT by Rockpile (GOP legislators-----caviar eating surrender monkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

God Lord, I hope not. We broke from the Pope, never to return for numerous reasons. Highly ranked among those reasons is the notion that the Pope is useless. That has been so clearly demonstrated by ravings of the lunatic currently in that position.


10 posted on 06/27/2016 8:24:39 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Would this mean they’d start having pot luck dinners at the Vatican?


11 posted on 06/27/2016 9:09:45 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Right now I’d volunteer to be Pope.


13 posted on 06/27/2016 10:08:06 PM PDT by CMB_polarization
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Why not? You’ve got an atheist now...


15 posted on 06/28/2016 5:54:51 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide
The pope cannot be Lutheran.

Correct. Therefore, by divine law, he is not pope. Catholic teaching that supports the OP:

Heretics and schismatics are barred from the Supreme Pontificate by the Divine Law itself, because, although by divine law they are not considered incapable of participating in a certain type of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, nevertheless, they must certainly be regarded as excluded from occupying the throne of the Apostolic See, which is the infallible teacher of the truth of the faith and the center of ecclesiastical unity” (Marato, Institutiones luris Canonici [1921] 2:184).

“Appointment to the Office of the Primacy. 1. What is required by divine law for this appointment... Also required for validity is that the one elected be a member of the Church; hence, heretics and apostates (at least public ones) are excluded....” "If indeed such a situation would happen, he [the Roman Pontiff] would, by divine law, fall from office without any sentence, indeed, without even a declaratory one. He who openly professes heresy places himself outside the Church, and it is not likely that Christ would preserve the Primacy of His Church in one so unworthy. Wherefore, if the Roman Pontiff were to profess heresy, before any condemnatory sentence (which would be impossible anyway) he would lose his authority” (Coronata, Institutiones Iuris Canonici [1950] 1:312,316).

17 posted on 06/28/2016 6:47:53 AM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

So, “Is the Pope Lutheran” is finally answered!


27 posted on 06/28/2016 11:40:39 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson