I think Thomas More made that clear.
It is of supreme importance that Bergoglio spews heresy. It is vitally important that Catholics who recognize his heresy for what it is expose it for other Catholics. Bergoglio should be mocked and shamed, that as many Catholics as possible should ignore his droolings. If, by the time he dies, Bergoglio is a laughingstock to virtually all Catholics, nothing could be better for the Church.
It may be true that Bergoglio is not “really” Pope. Just don’t invest much in the goal of actual removal from office. The people who made him Pope are too corrupt to listen. The people who COULD remove him are too cowardly. In More’s words, “Let God arrest him.”
Besides, using Thomas More's comments in this context was not even applicable here. He was speaking of English Law....not even Church Law.
Regardless, God has already "arrested" Francis according to the teaching of the Catholic Church re: manifest heretic "popes". Here is just a couple:
“Heretics and schismatics are barred from the Supreme Pontificate by the Divine Law itself, because, although by divine law they are not considered incapable of participating in a certain type of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, nevertheless, they must certainly be regarded as excluded from occupying the throne of the Apostolic See, which is the infallible teacher of the truth of the faith and the center of ecclesiastical unity” (Marato, Institutiones luris Canonici [1921] 2:184).
“Appointment to the Office of the Primacy. 1. What is required by divine lawfor this appointment... Also required for validity is that the one elected be a member of the Church; hence, heretics and apostates (at least public ones) are excluded....” “If indeed such a situation would happen, he [the Roman Pontiff] would, by divine law, fall from office without any sentence, indeed, without even a declaratory one. He who openly professes heresy places himself outside the Church, and it is not likely that Christ would preserve the Primacy of His Church in one so unworthy. Wherefore, if the Roman Pontiff were to profess heresy, before any condemnatory sentence (which would be impossible anyway) he would lose his authority” (Coronata, Institutiones Iuris Canonici [1950] 1:312,316).