Then that must mean that these things are not Scriptural either.
trinity
catholic
pope
eucharist
sacraments
annulment
assumption
immaculate conception
mass
purgatory
magisterium
infallible
confirmation
crucifix
rosary
mortal sin
venial sin
perpetual virginity
apostolic succession
indulgences
hyperdulia
catechism
real presence
transubstantiation
liturgy
free will
holy water
monstrance
sacred tradition
apostolic succession
Benefactress
Mediatrix
Queen of Heaven
Mother of God
beatific vision
invincible ignorance
Divine Office
guardian angel
Corporal Works of Mercy
Petrine authority
infallible
heresy
that'll leave a mark.
:D
Hoss
"So then, by that reasoning, (because a specific word or phrase is not found written down in Scripture it's not Scriptural), the Bible must not be “scriptural” and the Holy Trinity must not "scriptural". "
That's not my assumption. I accept "Trinity" AND "Incarnation" AND "Mother of God" AND "fellowshipping" with my dear metmom.
I'm not the one who thinks that truth is limited to "Sola Scriptura", remember? I'm a Catholic.
But "a term is illegitimate if it's not in my Concordance" seems to be your assumption, since you are trying to disqualify "Mother of God" because that particular phrase is not found in the Bible.
You're the one who says a phrase HAS to be in the text, ipsissima verba, or it's not really needed or not really legit. That has been your ultimate backup argument against "Mother of God."
`
`