Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

Consider that at the time she spoke, Mary was not pregnant. Neither had she any idea whether this pregnancy predicted by the Archangel was to commence in a week, a month, a year, or if it would be delayed until decades in the future, as was her ancestress Sarah’s renowned,heaven-predicted pregnancy. No timeline was announced.

There was no reason whatsoever for her to think it would be right away.

Therefore she is speaking of a pregnancy to come in the indefinite future.

That’s exactly what’s so strange about her troubled, puzzled response that she knows not man. She was a married woman. She knew where babies come from. Yet she apparently couldn’t work out in her mind where *her* future baby could come from. Her first thought was apparently not “Well, Joseph, my husband, of course.”


375 posted on 06/07/2016 10:11:13 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Blessed be God in His angels and in His saints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o
Therefore she is speaking of a pregnancy to come in the indefinite future.

That’s exactly what’s so strange about her troubled, puzzled response that she knows not man.

Make up your mind.

377 posted on 06/07/2016 11:12:31 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson