[piusv]

I find it fascinating that these two posters (who don't post all that much) have been told not to ping her and yet she doesn't ask you (and some other Protestants) to do the same.

Why is it that you, a Protestant, can say some pretty anti-Catholic posts on a regular basis and it's still okay for you to ping her? And yet those horrible, evil sedevacantists may not?

In my travels I have observed the anti-sedevacantism in Catholic circles. The hatred by certain Catholics for other Catholics who take the sedevacantist position in this unprecedented crisis is disgusting.

[Mrs. Don-o]

I didn’t say or imply anything at all about “horrible,” “evil,” or “hatred”. I reject this unprovoked insinuation of malice.

[SGNA]

You’re getting the idea of the parties behind it.

[Elsie]

Why is it that you, a Protestant, can say some pretty anti-Catholic posts on a regular basis...

Probably due to the fact that the posts are quite factual and not merely hot air, insults or opinions.

[daniel1212]

I find it fascinating that these two posters (who don't post all that much) have been told not to ping her and yet she doesn't ask you (and some other Protestants) to do the same. Why is it that you, a Protestant, can say some pretty anti-Catholic posts on a regular basis and it's still okay for you to ping her? And yet those horrible, evil sedevacantists may not? In my travels I have observed the anti-sedevacantism in Catholic circles. The hatred by certain Catholics for other Catholics who take the sedevacantist position in this unprecedented crisis is disgusting.

Who are you referring to? If one posts something that they should not think they should be protected from replies, though if a poster evidences that he/she is not fit to engage in meaningful exchange (resorting to spitwads in lieu of an argument; constant arguments by unsubstantiated opinion; etc.), then they can expect to be placed on an ignore list. Yet while one may request not to be pinged to posts they were not involved in, by participating in a forum then one is choosing to engage in exchange.

As for why a Protestant can say some pretty anti-Catholic posts on a regular basis and it's still okay to ping a certain poster but who requests sedevacantists do not, i would say that has to do with the nature of the exchange. Asserting something like Pope Benedict didn't believe in the Resurrection seems pretty absurd to me.

But why is it wrong from a RC to ask a certain poster, who is disobeying forum rules by repeatedly asking a question (not that your question did not warrant an answer) of a person who has expressed she finds you unfit for exchange (and in the past whose posts were reviewed and either posted or denied for several weeks), to not ping or post to her, while you state that you do not wish to debate any Protestant?

As for personalities, while i have strongly and substantively (by the grace of God) opposed RC teachings and the promotion of Rome, regardless of the poster, i consider Mrs. Don-o to be one of the most cordial RC regulars here.