Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forte: Pope Did Not Want to Speak “Plainly” Of Communion for Remarried [Catholic Caucus]
One Peter Five ^ | May 7, 2016 | Steve Skojec

Posted on 05/07/2016 9:00:43 PM PDT by ebb tide

At a meeting to discuss the apostolic exhoration Amoris Laetitia, Archbishop Bruno Forte revealed new insights into the mind of Pope Francis on one of the most controversial issues facing the Church: communion for the divorced and “remarried.” Forte was the man personally chosen by Pope Francis as the Special Secretary for the synods on marriage and family, and he is widely believed responsible for the insertion of the explosive language pertaining to homosexuals in the 2014 Synod’s mid-term relatio.

During his presentation, the details of which were published on 3 May on the Italian news website, Zonalocale.it, Forte recalled certain discussions that were had during the Synod. The following is our (excerpted) translation with emphasis added:

“Not a new doctrine, but the merciful application of that ‘old wine’ that, as is known, is always the best.” Thus Monsignor Bruno Forte, archbishop of the diocese of Chieti-Vasto, during the encounter at the Teatro Rossetti on Pope Francis’ Apostolic Exhortation Amoris Laetitia, which has marked a fundamental passage with regard to the family, “between crisis and desire.” A crisis, on account of the facts related by the same Monsignor Forte, which see marriages diminishing and cohabitation increasing, but also the desire to see the family as the “womb and the school of humanity”…

In the reflection of Monsignor Forte: the causes of the “crisis of the family,” from lack of work to housing problems, the phenomenon of migration, to the difficulties attached to “material and human misery.” In this context, the sense of the apostolic exhortation of Pope Francis [is]: “Don’t judge, but reach out to all with the gaze of mercy, but without renouncing the Truth of God. It is easy to say, ‘that family has failed’; more difficult to help it not to fail. No one ought to feel themselves excluded from the Church.”

An approach that naturally has “practical” repercussions in the area of direct indications for pastors and the ecclesial community. Archbishop Forte has in fact revealed a “behind the scenes” [moment] from the Synod: “If we speak explicitly about communion for the divorced and remarried,” said Archbishop Forte, reporting a joke of Pope Francis, “you do not know what a terrible mess we will make. So we won’t speak plainly, do it in a way that the premises are there, then I will draw out the conclusions.”

“Typical of a Jesuit,” Abp Forte joked, attributing to that suggestion a wisdom that has allowed the maturation necessary to conclude that Amoris Laetitia, as Abp. Bruno Forte explained, does not represent a new doctrine, but the “merciful application” of that [the doctrine]of all time.

What is most important to note is the fact that Forte, by Francis’ personal choice and appointment Special Secretary to the Synod, is stating — publicly, and without apparent concern for consequence — that the Pope intentionally manipulated the synodal process — against the will of the Bishops –to get an outcome that he knew would not be otherwise acceptable.

(English translation provided by Roberto Tommaso. The original Italian of our excerpted translation follows):

“Non una nuova dottrina, ma l’applicazione misericordiosa di quel ‘vino vecchio’ che, come si sa, è sempre il più buono”. Così monsignor Bruno Forte, arcivescovo della diocesi Chieti-Vasto, durante l’incontro presso il Teatro Rossetti sull’Esortazione Apostolica di Papa Francesco “Amoris laetitia”, che ha segnato un passaggio fondamentale per quanto riguarda la famiglia, “tra crisi e desiderio”. Crisi, per quel dato rilevato dallo stesso monsignor Forte, per cui diminuiscono i matrimoni e aumentano le convivenze, ma anche desiderio di quella famiglia “grembo e scuola di umanità”…

Nella riflessione di monsignor Forte, le cause della “crisi della famiglia”, dalla mancanza di lavoro ai problemi abitativi, i fenomeni migratori, fino alle difficoltà legate alla “miseria materiale e umana”. In questo contesto, il senso dell’Esortazione Apostolica di Papa Francesco: “Non giudicare, ma raggiungere tutti con lo sguardo della misericordia, ma senza rinunciare alla Verità di Dio. È facile dire ‘quella famiglia è fallita’, più difficile aiutarla a non fallire. Nessuno deve sentirsi escluso dalla Chiesa”.

Un’impostazione che naturalmente ha anche ricadute “pratiche” nell’ambito delle indicazioni dirette ai pastori e alla comunità ecclesiale. Monsignor Forte ha infatti rivelato un particolare “retroscena” del Sinodo: “Se parliamo esplicitamente di comunione ai divorziati e risposati – ha riferito monsignor Forte riportando una battuta di Papa Francesco – questi non sai che casino che ci combinano. Allora non ne parliamo in modo diretto, fai in modo che ci siano le premesse, poi le conclusioni le trarrò io”.

“Tipico di un gesuita” ha scherzato monsignor Forte, attribuendo a quella indicazione una saggezza che ha permesso la maturazione necessaria per giungere alla “Amoris laetitia” che, come precisato da monsignor Bruno Forte, non rappresenta una nuova dottrina, ma “l’applicazione misericordiosa” di quella di sempre.

*Our translator, who provides Italian-to-English translations for the Church in Italy, offers us his work under this pseudonym.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS: adultery; epa; forte; francischurch; globalwarminghoax; heresy; popefrancis; romancatholicism
“If we speak explicitly about communion for the divorced and remarried,” said Archbishop Forte, reporting a joke of Pope Francis, “you do not know what a terrible mess we will make. So we won’t speak plainly, do it in a way that the premises are there, then I will draw out the conclusions.”

“Typical of a Jesuit,” Abp Forte joked, attributing to that suggestion a wisdom that has allowed the maturation necessary to conclude that Amoris Laetitia, as Abp. Bruno Forte explained, does not represent a new doctrine, but the “merciful application” of that [the doctrine]of all time.

As Forte reports, Francis jokes about sacrilegiously giving Holy Communion to unrepentant adulterers by making a " terrible mess".

1 posted on 05/07/2016 9:00:43 PM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

It was such thinking that led Pascal to write the Provincial letters.


2 posted on 05/07/2016 9:11:45 PM PDT by RobbyS (```JMJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

It is not sinful to pray that the Pope enter eternal happiness, as soon as possible.

Pray that a new Pope may be elected soon, and that he will be a Catholic who will teach the truth, and wake up the people of the West to the Marxist, Muslim, enviro-wacko, genocidal, collectivist enemy who is making war on the Catholic Church, on all Christians, and Western Civilization.


3 posted on 05/07/2016 9:19:17 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
The Cathechism says it pretty plainly: "1665 The remarriage of persons divorced from a living, lawful spouse contravenes the plan and law of God as taught by Christ. They are not separated from the Church, but they cannot receive Eucharistic communion."
4 posted on 05/08/2016 1:29:23 AM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
What is most important to note is the fact that Forte, by Francis’ personal choice and appointment Special Secretary to the Synod, is stating — publicly, and without apparent concern for consequence — that the Pope intentionally manipulated the synodal process — against the will of the Bishops –to get an outcome that he knew would not be otherwise acceptable.

I am sure the deniers will be along any minute now.

5 posted on 05/08/2016 4:10:02 AM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Oriental Girl
Bergoglio is a heretic himself and not a Catholic. As you stated he does believe and teach incorrectly. However, depending on WHAT he says on any given day, due to his own ineptness, he may not go far enough to indeed express something EXACTLY incorrectly.

Here are a couple quick quotes to try to explain the Church's teaching in this area. If you need others I'll put the up as well.

Venerable Pope Pius IX, Singulari Quadam, Allocution against the Errors of Rationalism and Indifferentism, December 9, 1854

"It must indeed be held as being of Faith that nobody can be saved outside the Apostolic Roman Church, the only ark of salvation, into which if anybody does not enter he will perish by the flood; but it must nevertheless be likewise held for certain that those who suffer from ignorance of the true religion, provided that it is invincible, will not be held accountable for this."

Venerable Pope Pius IX, Quanto Conficiamur Moerore, August 10, 1863

"And here, beloved Sons and Venerable Brethren, it is necessary once more to mention and censure the serious error into which some Catholics have unfortunately fallen. For they are of the opinion that men who live in errors, estranged from the true faith and from Catholic unity, can attain eternal life. This is in direct opposition to Catholic teaching."

We all know that those who are afflicted with invincible ignorance with regard to our holy religion, if they carefully keep the precepts of the natural law that have been written by God in the hearts of all men, if they are prepared to obey God, and if they lead a virtuous and dutiful life, can attain eternal life by the power of divine light and grace. For God, Who reads comprehensively in every detail the minds and souls, the thoughts and habits of all men, will not permit, in accordance with His infinite goodness and mercy, anyone who is not guilty of a voluntary fault to suffer eternal torments (suppliciis).

However, also well-known is the Catholic dogma that no one can be saved outside the Catholic Church, and that those who obstinately oppose the authority and definitions of the church, and who stubbornly remain separated form the unity of the Church and from the successor of Peter, the Roman Pontiff (to whom the Saviour has entrusted the care of His vineyard), cannot attain salvation."

7 posted on 05/08/2016 12:37:24 PM PDT by SGNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SGNA

The key is invincible ignorance. How many can truly claim “invincible” ignorance?


8 posted on 05/08/2016 2:46:37 PM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

...and Luther the 95 Thesis.


9 posted on 05/08/2016 7:25:30 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: piusv

Exactly - but that’s a “Management Decision”, and all of us here on earth in the Church Militant are just labor.


10 posted on 05/08/2016 10:01:44 PM PDT by SGNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oriental Girl; piusv

Here is an attempt at listing all of Bergoglio’s transgressions:

http://novusordowatch.org/pope-francis.htm


11 posted on 05/08/2016 10:01:44 PM PDT by SGNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SGNA

Ha ha..yes. However, the Church should be teaching there is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church. For 50+ years this has not been at the forefront. False ecumenism has.


12 posted on 05/09/2016 4:55:09 AM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: piusv
The Roman Catholic Church would indeed be teaching that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church - but the "bait and switch Church of Vatican-2" is not the Catholic Church - hence it does not.
13 posted on 05/10/2016 1:08:13 PM PDT by SGNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SGNA

Is it live or is it Memorex?


14 posted on 05/10/2016 1:17:30 PM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: piusv

Judge by the lightning strikes!


15 posted on 05/10/2016 3:48:49 PM PDT by SGNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson