[verga]

Please re-read what I wrote, Mary was in a “spiritual” relationship with the Holy s Spirit. It was addressed in the article.

[MHGinTN]

BUT the child in her womb was a real being, gestating by the protective acceptance Mary had extended to the invitation God sent via an Angel. Mary was already in a maariage contract with Joseph, a physical relationship is a strong im[plied int hat contractual agreement.

Your argument appears to be confusing contractual obligations, as if seeking to open a gap into which you intend to insert the presumption of perpetual virginity.

FRiend, if you are going to offer what you deem scriptural proof of this assumption of perpetual virginity then you will need to stick to one line of argument at a time, rather than bouncing between two disjoined lines and trying to conflate them.

I am so please however that you are studying the scriptures using more than one language, because your soul will have opened to it more than merely reading King James English, which is500 years away from our vernacular.

[metmom]

Please re-read what I wrote, Mary was in a “spiritual” relationship with the Holy s Spirit. It was addressed in the article.

Then there is no reason for her to not be in physical relationship with the man to whom she was married.

[Elsie]

Please re-read what I wrote, Mary was in a “spiritual” relationship with the Holy s Spirit. It was addressed in the article.

So are three of his wives...