Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Delta 21
1850 King James Version w/Strong’s Concordance

I see your one reference and give you a dozen. They do not all agree. Some say yeah, other say nay.

http://biblehub.com/commentaries/matthew/1-25.htm

The word ‘till’ (untill) does not mean NEVER DID. It means UNTILL.

(Young's Literal Translation) 2 Samuel 6:23 As to Michal daughter of Saul, she had no child till the day of her death.

If I say, "I'm going to abstain from chocolate until Lent is over.", does this mean I will have chocolate after lent? It means I could without breaking my word, but it does not mean that I will.

The word until makes a claim up unto a certain point. That is perfectly clear. The word until does not necessarily make a point about after a certain point. Using "modifiers" to explain "time disparity" in the original language is a better argument than using English and common sense.

But the point is that using the word "until" is not a slam dunk to debunk the ever virgin status of Mary.

642 posted on 03/15/2016 9:02:32 AM PDT by Tao Yin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 638 | View Replies ]


To: Tao Yin
Then why doesn't the Holy Spirit say, very simply, Joseph never had normal, God-commanded marital relationships with his wife? Why does He say, "until" instead of "never ? To tease us with Biblical conundrums? Heh.

And why did Joseph take her as his wife even when he knew that her babe was not his? So God could pull a fast one on the watching community, that her babe would not be identified as a bastard for lack of a husband, or that her babe was not of fornication with Joseph before the year-long pre-nuptial betrothal had passed according to the custom of insuring that she was a virgin at the formal consummation?

No. God does not play lying games.

Joseph married Mary in order that Jesus could be counted as David's legitimate royal heir, though Joseph refrained while that time of proof of her virginity right up to the babes birth passed, and all could witness thereto.

You'd better think out what all this means, particularly in view of the cultural context.

649 posted on 03/15/2016 9:40:29 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]

To: Tao Yin
As to Michal daughter of Saul, she had no child till the day of her death.
..could just as easily read,"As to Michal daughter of Saul, she had no child till the day after tomorrow.

Why are you parsing scripture trying to make the entire sentence means what one word in the sentence does without its modifiers?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I see the shotgun/claymore effect has taken place on this thread finally. It is now impossible to extract context or true meaning out of anything said.

My responses are concluded here.

I give you the last word.

661 posted on 03/15/2016 11:44:43 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]

To: Tao Yin
Then why doesn't the Holy Spirit say, very simply, Joseph never had normal, God-commanded marital relationships with his wife? Why does He say, "until" instead of "never ? To tease us with Biblical conundrums? Heh.

And why did Joseph take her as his wife even when he knew that her babe was not his? So God could pull a fast one on the watching community, that her babe would not be identified as a bastard for lack of a husband, or that her babe was not of fornication with Joseph before the year-long pre-nuptial betrothal had passed according to the custom of insuring that she was a virgin at the formal consummation?

No. God does not play lying games.

Joseph married Mary in order that Jesus could be counted as David's legitimate royal heir, though Joseph refrained while that time of proof of her virginity right up to the babes birth passed, and all could witness thereto.

You'd better think out what all this means, particularly in view of the cultural context.

671 posted on 03/15/2016 6:49:07 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]

To: Tao Yin
If I say, "I'm going to abstain from chocolate until Lent is over.", does this mean I will have chocolate after lent?

Probably.

Why 'abstain' from something that you are not likely to do in the first place?


"I'm going to abstain from chocolate FOREVER!" says another thing.

Although...

"I'm going to abstain from mountain oysters until Lent is over.", does NOT mean that I've EVER had them or intend to after Lent!

696 posted on 03/16/2016 3:32:38 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]

To: Tao Yin
If I say, "I'm going to abstain from chocolate until Lent is over.", does this mean I will have chocolate after lent?

Probably.

Why 'abstain' from something that you are not likely to do in the first place?


"I'm going to abstain from chocolate FOREVER!" says another thing.

Although...

"I'm going to abstain from mountain oysters until Lent is over.", does NOT mean that I've EVER had them or intend to after Lent!

697 posted on 03/16/2016 3:33:41 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]

To: Tao Yin

Lent

Yet another man made ‘tradition’ not found in the bible.


698 posted on 03/16/2016 3:34:39 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson