Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: rwa265

This is about what Catholics are saying on this thread.

They are saying that GOD died on the cross and Mary conceived the second person of the Trinity.

It’s not what I believe that’s the topic and changing it to that isn’t going to address what Catholics are saying.


951 posted on 01/06/2016 3:35:44 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 897 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

This is about what Catholics are saying on this thread.

They are saying that GOD died on the cross and Mary conceived the second person of the Trinity.

It’s not what I believe that’s the topic and changing it to that isn’t going to address what Catholics are saying.


I am trying to understand how what Catholics say can be interpreted differently.

You state that they are saying Mary conceived the second person of the Trinity.

Isn’t this what the Holy Spirit reveals through Luke in Chapter 1:26-35?

The angel Gabriel told Mary, “thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name Jesus.” When Mary asks the angel how this shall be, he answered that “The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.”

Isn’t “that holy thing which shall be born of thee and shall be called the Son of God” the second person of the Trinity?

If not, what other explanation is there?


1,027 posted on 01/06/2016 11:14:20 AM PST by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 951 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson