This is about what Catholics are saying on this thread.
They are saying that GOD died on the cross and Mary conceived the second person of the Trinity.
It’s not what I believe that’s the topic and changing it to that isnât going to address what Catholics are saying.
I am trying to understand how what Catholics say can be interpreted differently.
You state that they are saying Mary conceived the second person of the Trinity.
Isn’t this what the Holy Spirit reveals through Luke in Chapter 1:26-35?
The angel Gabriel told Mary, “thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name Jesus.” When Mary asks the angel how this shall be, he answered that “The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.”
Isn’t “that holy thing which shall be born of thee and shall be called the Son of God” the second person of the Trinity?
If not, what other explanation is there?
The other explanation is that she bore the incarnation of the second person of the Trinity, which says a different thing than saying she bore the second person of the Trinity.