To: BlueDragon
I don’t need to explain how a woman can have a son who always existed, because it’s totally irrelevant.
To: Arthur McGowan; Elsie
I don't need to explain how a woman can have a son who always existed, because it's totally irrelevant.
Then you have isolated the syllogism from the greater truths of the matter, when that same is applied narrowly & specifically to the relationship of Mary & Christ, thus rendering that syllogism to be irrelevant.
Enjoy the music. It's not saying what one may think, on first hearing of it...
945 posted on
01/05/2016 9:24:05 PM PST by
BlueDragon
(TheHildbeast is so bad, purty near anybody should beat her. And that's saying something)
To: Arthur McGowan
I don’t need to explain how a woman can have a son who always existed, because it’s totally irrelevant.Ain't you special!
986 posted on
01/06/2016 5:27:44 AM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson