It was metmom who asked why someone else’s interpretation was better than hers. I simply asked why someone else’s was better than mine. It is you who interjected the worn out insults about Catholics not being Christian and not knowing anything about the bible in a personal, condescending post. Now you try to act like no insult was intended. That’s not very honest, or very loving toward a fellow Christian, is it? And nobody has addressed metmom’s question, which is, “Why is anyone’s interpretation better than anyone else’s? Who gets to decide whose interpretation is “inspired by the Holy Spirit?”
And yes, I can love your soul and not like your self-righteous self one little bit.
Love,
O2
Gee, got a link? If you can prove that, I'll apologize but that is not what I said.
Now you try to act like no insult was intended.
Not acting, none was intended. You sure have a thin skin.
And yes, I can love your soul and not like your self-righteous self one little bit.
Oh my the snark!
And what did you accuse me of?
Oh yeah, like "That's not very honest, or very loving toward a fellow Christian, is it?" that is loving?
Looks like YOU are the one questioning someone's Christianity.
Thanks for the response, read my post again slowly if you really want to know that I really said.
FR reports - You decide