I have no disciples. But it is entertaining of you to suggest it.
Anyway, in the absence of any substantive rebuttal from you on the major points, I'd say we're done for now. I leave the reader to make up their own mind.
Peace,
SR
I don't mean that you seek out disciples, but surely you have noticed the following and accolades, how many depend on you for your antiCatholic analyses. They would be devastated if you publicly embraced something so Catholic, so go easy on them.
Anyway, in the absence of any substantive rebuttal from you on the major points, I'd say we're done for now. I leave the reader to make up their own mind.
As if you were able to compel the reader otherwise ...
I'll stand with the Hebrews, and I expect Luke to be there too, and there is no contradiction. And they took Lot, Abram's brother's son, who dwelt in Sodom, and his goods, and departed. And there came one that had escaped, and told Abram the Hebrew; for he dwelt in the plain of Mamre the Amorite, brother of Eschol, and brother of Aner: and these were confederate with Abram. And when Abram heard that his brother was taken captive, he armed his trained servants, born in his own house, three hundred and eighteen, and pursued them unto Dan. And he divided himself against them, he and his servants, by night, and smote them, and pursued them unto Hobah, which is on the left hand of Damascus. And he brought back all the goods, and also brought again his brother Lot, and his goods, and the women also, and the people.
Genesis, Catholic chapter fourteen, Protestant verses twelve to sixteen,
as authorized, but not authored,
by King James
bold and underline emphasis mine