I don't see a contradiction of the Byzantine vs. Alexandrian primary texts. The verse that follows makes it clear. We can discuss that if you want. Mr Rogers NEVER made a claim reference Christians committing mortal sins getting a free ride on such sins. He pointed out in one post the entirety of Romans 8 where Paul tells the Roman church "whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified." Sounds like a promise.
What happened when David committed murder and adultery? What did God do to reach David? He convicted David through Nathan the prophet. Who do we as Christians have to convict us of sin? Who do we have as Christians to give us the strength to resist temptations? Who do we have as Christians to indwell us and conform us to the Image of the Son?
If we lack faith for our Almighty God to preserve us and sanctify us, are we not denying His Power and Promise? Is that not sinning against the Holy Spirit Who testifies of Christ's Finished Work?
I have to ask again. Is not the NABRE the official and approved English language version Bible for the Catholic church? If yes then you should not be pointing fingers at Mr Rogers. The NABRE has the same wording of Romans 8 as the NASB.
“What happened when David committed murder and adultery? What did God do to reach David? He convicted David through Nathan the prophet. Who do we as Christians have to convict us of sin? Who do we have as Christians to give us the strength to resist temptations? Who do we have as Christians to indwell us and conform us to the Image of the Son? “
Worth repeating, praise God!
Mr Rogers NEVER made a claim reference Christians committing mortal sins getting a free ride on such sins. He pointed out in one post the entirety of Romans 8 where Paul tells the Roman church "whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified." Sounds like a promise.
I thought it was clear that he claimed once justified a person could not be condemned no matter what that person did afterward. Do you hold differntly, like the Catholics/Orthodox ?
And David confessed his sin to Nathan the prophet ... and Nathan the prophet told David his sin was forgiven ... sounds quite Catholic ...
I have to ask again. Is not the NABRE the official and approved English language version Bible for the Catholic church? If yes then you should not be pointing fingers at Mr Rogers. The NABRE has the same wording of Romans 8 as the NASB.
Already answered; I have no problem with you adopting the same Bible as the Catholic Church; I would you would adopt all the same faith, liturgy and customs as Catholics.
My point is that the Protestant Reformation started out with a different set of scriptures and posited a new doctrine of Sola Scriptura based on them. Your testimony demostrates to me that the so-called Reformation did not have the same scriptures that the Protestants and their devolved communities use today (sans some of the Independent Fundamental Baptists and perhaps a few others). Since they rebelled and divorced themselves from Holy Tradition, which does not rely and any particular set of Greek manuscripts or translations for truth, and asserted they only relied on the Word of God, their claim to legitimacy is invalid.