I trust the NASB to be an uncommonly accurate and literal translation - more so than the KJV, and more so than the DR’s translation of the Latin translation.
Interesting, but I did not ask that. Should I take from that you acknowledge it is not inerrant or complete, nor are the manuscripts it is based on inerrant or complete, nor is Sola Scriptura inerrant or complete since at the time it was professed those professing it used a different set of manuscripts and translation than you espouse today ?