Posted on 10/09/2015 4:27:53 PM PDT by markomalley
On Monday, the Catholic Voice, the official publication of the diocese of Oakland, California, published a homily telling Catholics not to condemn active homosexual relationships.
Retired pastor Fr. Dan Danielson asserts in his homily originally said on June 28, the Sunday following the U.S. Supreme Court's revolutionary ruling legalizing gay "marriage" in all 50 states that some people are born gay and that "no one simply chooses" to be gay, despite overwhelming sociological evidence to the contrary. He insists that being gay is not "sinful or wrong" or even "bad."
He goes on to attack those who "discriminate" against homosexuals, saying that their so-called hateful behavior reveals "insecurities" about their own sexual identity.
Father Danielson admits that although a heterosexual marriage is the "best environment," there are also "many homosexual couples who raise children with great love." He says no one can judge the "stable" and "admirable" qualities of homosexual relationships, and that these relationships are "not to be simply condemned as sinful."
He says that while the Church's teaching on marriage is "generally correct," it "does not work out" in "many instances." He concludes that we must accept gay persons "as God accepts us all without judgment or superiority."
Father Danielson has a long history of supporting gay "marriage" and suppressing authentic Catholic liturgy.
California Catholic Daily reported that in 1998, then Bishop John Cummins expressed displeasure with Fr. Danielson and told him to stop talking to the press after news got out that he was allowing gay "marriages" at his parish, St. Elizabeth Seton.
One lesbian wedding was attempted on May 9, 1998, but was canceled after a number of faithful Catholics publicly protested the event. At the time, Fr. Danielson bragged that he would simply continue blessing gay unions outside the church building.
This scandal was brought up again in 2009 by California Catholic Daily and Catholic News Agency (CNA) when it was announced that Fr. Danielson would become the new interim administrator for the Oakland diocese while Abp. Allen Vigneron was transferred from Oakland to Detroit. When CNA asked Mike Brown, the Oakland diocese director for communications, about this scandal, he denied that Fr. Danielson had performed any gay marriages, claiming he had merely tried to "pray over commitments of love." When CNA asked Brown whether the blessings of sinful unions was a public scandal, Brown punted. "That sounds like a theological question."
To this day, Fr. Danielson's old parish, St. Elizabeth Seton, does not refer to itself as a church but rather as "the Catholic Community of Pleasanton" per the wishes of Fr. Danielson, who once said in a homily, "This is not a church but a gathering space."
When the parish's new $5 million church building was completed, Fr. Danielson ordered that there be no statues, Stations of the Cross, kneelers, corpus on the crucifix, or tabernacle (the tabernacle was stored in a different building). He told his congregation, "There is no sanctuary because this is all holy ground now."
But that's not all. When Fr. Danielson retired from St. Elizabeth Seton in 2007, there was public outcry about the priest who was to be his replacement, Fr. Padraig Greene. Father Danielson defended Fr. Greene, despite the fact that he was arrested for lewd behavior at the public bathroom of a childrens park.
The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) protested, arguing that Fr. Greene "shouldn't be placed in positions in which he's in charge of Catholic kids." At the time, the diocese of Oakland reportedly responded that then-Oakland Abp. Allen Vigneron considered the arrest "a single isolated incident." Father Danielson also defended Fr. Greene, saying that SNAP's view was "understandable, but it can lead to a misinterpretation of the facts."
Now the Oakland diocesan paper has published Fr. Danielson's pro-gay homily. This situation is similar to a recent one in the Boston archdiocese; last month Churchmilitant.com broke a story about Msgr. Paul Garrity, who wrote a pro-homosexualist piece for the archdiocese of Boston's official newspaper, The Pilot. Some of the faithful wrote an open letter to Cdl. Sean O'Malley, head of the archdiocese, to retract the scandalous article.
The timing of these two pro-gay publications has not been lost on the faithful, who are asking: Is it pure coincidence that these dioceses are publishing such articles just as the Synod on the Family gets underway?
For the record (and I hate that I have to bother with this), the Catechism states:
Chastity and homosexuality
2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,140 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."141 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.
2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God's will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.
2359 Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.
Alas, Babylon.
Cue techno (”Entz, entz, entz”) music.
Perfect response.
He is wrong...I realize that there are MANY honest and respectable people who are gay and a few who actually raise decent kids...that, however, in no way, justifies their relationship as far as the church is concerned. It is truly sad that something can’t be done about it.....but it can’t.
And so begins the final descent of the Catholic Church.
The church has been hijacked by militant Marxist homosexuals.
No surprise, it’s in keeping with the times.
End times.
So when God blasted Sodom & Gomorrah from the face of the earth He was having issues with His own sexual identity? Seriously?
Then I guess heterosexual promisciuty isn’t a sin, eh, Francie?
“He goes on to attack those who “discriminate” against homosexuals, saying that their so-called hateful behavior reveals “insecurities” about their own sexual identity.”
Notice that he rules out or ignores the overwhelming majority of the population that does not discriminate or engage in hateful behavior toward homosexuals, but seeks to tie everyone together with the exception, not the rule.
That type of deception reveals that the priest is homosexual and trying to hide behind victimization.
I guess they forgot Sodom and Gomorrah, Levitical law on relations, etc ..
God is a homophobe?
Not my father’s Roman Catholic Church, nor mine when I was a Catholic.
sicko
Dear Oakland diocese: look to the Bible (we’ll gladly send you one if, as it appears, you don’t have one)
secular ‘authority’ like the (gravely suspect) USSCt is not your proper source of guidance in the Church
This worldly pastors bibilcally indefensible statement brings Galatians 1:8-9 to mind.
So, is all this in an attempt to excuse the perversion of all the pedophile priests in the Catholic [and other] churches, or an appeasement to keep the limp-wristers in government happy and thus off their backs, so to speak? He is also propagandizing the acceptance of homosexuality within the flock. Disgusting.
Revelation 3:14To the angel of the church in Laodicea,* write this:
The Amen, the faithful and true witness, the source of Gods creation, says this:h 15I know your works; I know that you are neither cold nor hot.* I wish you were either cold or hot. 16* So, because you are lukewarm, neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth. 17* i For you say, I am rich and affluent and have no need of anything, and yet do not realize that you are wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked. 18I advise you to buy from me gold refined by fire* so that you may be rich, and white garments to put on so that your shameful nakedness may not be exposed, and buy ointment to smear on your eyes so that you may see. 19Those whom I love, I reprove and chastise. Be earnest, therefore, and repent.j
20Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, [then] I will enter his house and dine with him, and he with me.* 21I will give the victor the right to sit with me on my throne, as I myself first won the victory and sit with my Father on his throne.k
22Whoever has ears ought to hear what the Spirit says to the churches.
http://www.usccb.org/bible/revelation/3
Please be a victor! [2:7] Victor: referring to any Christian individual who holds fast to the faith and does Gods will in the face of persecution.
I don’t think so. This old reprobate, Fr. Danielson, ought to have been bounced out —— with his faculties suspended, left without assignment -— and it is serious pastoral malpractice that this was not done decades ago.<>
However the infidelity of some in the church, does not mark the “final descent” of the Church itself. If this were so, the Church would have been finished on Passover 33 AD, when one Apostle betrayed Our Lord, one denied Him three times, and the rest — except for young John-— headed for the tall grass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.