Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ebb tide

“Are you proposing that Lutherans are heretics while Anglicans are not?”

Where did I say that? Oh, that’s right – you made it up!

“Your arguments sounds like you are. If not, please clarify.”

Not even remotely does it sound like that – since I NEVER EVEN MENTIONED LUTHERANS! No clarification therefore could possibly be needed.

“From the Catholic Encyclopedia. Ever heard of it, Vlad?”

Doesn’t matter if I have or not since it doesn’t satisfy this: “Do you know of even a SINGLE Church document that refers to them as heretics rather than as Anglicans since after the pontificate of Leo XIII?” The 1909 [American] Catholic Encyclopedia is not an official document of the universal Church.

“Anglicans are just as protestant and heretical as Lutherans.”

Do you have anything that satisfies this or not: “Do you know of even a SINGLE Church document that refers to them as heretics rather than as Anglicans since after the pontificate of Leo XIII?”

“You just don’t get it. As usual.”

1521 – Pope Leo X dies. 1534 – Henry VIII seizes control of the Church in England. It’s you who doesn’t get it and you keep demonstrating that.

“P.S. What’s your problem with Pope Leo’s X and XIII?”

Where did I say I have a problem with them?


386 posted on 09/06/2015 7:09:29 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998
Doesn’t matter if I have or not since it doesn’t satisfy this: “Do you know of even a SINGLE Church document that refers to them as heretics rather than as Anglicans since after the pontificate of Leo XIII?”

Once again, the Catholic Church has always considered all protestants to be heretics. What part of this do you not understand? Why do you single out Anglicans? Do you somehow think they are Catholic? And Lutherans are not?

Why do you ignore the pontificate of Leo XIII? Are you a schismatic?

387 posted on 09/06/2015 7:18:46 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies ]

To: vladimir998
Oh, that’s right – you made it up!

I did not make up anything. I'm asking you why you make it a point to differentiate Anglicans from Lutherans. You continually refuse to answer that question. After all, we are talking about heretics.

P.S. Did you know Walter Cardinal Kasper, Francis' favorite, is a heretic himself? Kasper has questioned the historicity of Christ's Resurrection, ergo he is a heretic.

Heresy comes in all flavors, Vlad; some as "religions" and others in individuals. Try not to join the crowd.

389 posted on 09/06/2015 7:44:44 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide; vladimir998

So you’re being asked to look for a Church document between the years 1896 and Vatican II. As far as I know there isn’t even a document about the Anglicans during that short period of time, probably because there was no need.

Meanwhile traditional Church teaching has always considered the Anglicans heretics. Anyone who believes otherwise needs to offer up Church teaching that teaches otherwise.


397 posted on 09/07/2015 5:04:21 AM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson