“What’s wrong with Pope Leo XIII?”
Where did I say there was something wrong with him?
“Do you not consider him to be a Catholic pope?”
Where did I say he was not a Catholic pope? What other kind of pope would he be exactly?
“If not, you’re making my point that the Church has digressed from it’s past, true teaching.”
No and no. Since you were wrongfooted on every question you just asked no one made any point for you. Your constant errors, however, certainly make a point against you.
Then why did you use a Pope Leo XXXIII as benchmark for declaring Anglicans to no longer be heretics? You seem to be inferring that “things have changed” since 1896 A.D.
You could have used Pope Leo X. Why did you choose Leo XIII? Were both Leo’s wrong and Vlad be right? I doubt it; I highly doubt it. As of matter of fact, I know it.