Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Nabber
The inaccuracy of C-14 tests, of any type, on textiles compared to the accompanying bodies, has been documented in a number of cases.

That's been reported anecdotal,y, but no studies have been done to show it to be true. It may be, but I doubt it in this case. The reason given in the other cases has been the bacteri contamination, as the cloth they were testing was severely contaminated with mold and lichens and bacteri from years of exposure. The Shroud is remarkably clean of such contaminants. We DO know what happened in the 1988 C-14 test. . , three different, mutually exclusive approaches have prove that what was tested was a patch made of cotton, probably made in the sixteenth or seventeenth century to repair that frayed corner. We still have the fifth unburnt sub-sample that was retained from the 1988 test and one half of it is Cotton, one half Original linen. Documentary evidence has been found backing that.

59 posted on 09/02/2015 10:33:34 PM PDT by Swordmaker ( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

Carbon dating of textiles has had problems with accuracy: an Egyptian mummy-wrapping (Manchester mummy collection) showed an age 700 years younger than the body.


60 posted on 09/03/2015 1:26:03 PM PDT by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson