Yes. Yes you did. And then you ignored your own posting of the definition. Two is a specific number. It's not indeterminate. And yet you appeal to a definition that you seem to fail to adhere to in the argument.
As I said, if repeating over and over and over, "I was right all along. You were wrong. That won't change" makes you feel better, then by all means continue. Although it does vaguely remind me of Stuart Smalley's mantra of, "I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people like me!"
Hoss
“Two is a specific number. It’s not indeterminate. And yet you appeal to a definition that you seem to fail to adhere to in the argument.”
Wow, yet another example of failed education in America. Hoss, think. Try it. Two is a number. Two is more than one. “Some” is an indeterminate number more than one. Thus, “two” can be “some”, and “some” is not necessarily limited to “two” as I said (I only posted two who I know have published a book or article on the subject).
I was right all along. You were wrong then and are still wrong now. That won’t change no matter how desperately you engage these bizarre appeals to semantics that don’t even support you.