This kind of thinking, especially given his change in attitude toward the Jews later on, is to a Catholic a total discredit to Luther's ideas. This is the same as another doubting/recurring the Catholic Sacred Tradition.
Therefore, deciding that Maccabees is not a point of discussion is rendering the discussion one-sided.
Thank you for reading it over...
An honest read will indicate the status of the apocrypha as being canon was not officially settled for the rcc until Trent in 1546.
The reader should also draw the conclusion that Jerome, not Luther, held more sway over the decision to relegate the apocrypha to a secondary status.
The reader will also note that Origen and Athanasius also were centers of influence in not including these books as canon.
So here we have again some ECFs that are in favor of inclusion and some against.
I have found this is the case with all of the points of contention we discuss on these threads.
Four primary factors influenced Jerome's criteria for inclusion or rejection of the apocrypha.
Obviously, the inferior rank to which the deuteros were relegated by authorities like Origen, Athanasius, and Jerome, was due to too rigid a conception of canonicity, one demanding that a book, to be entitled to this supreme dignity,
1)must be received by all,
2)must have the sanction of Jewish antiquity, and
3)must moreover be adapted not only to edification,
4) but also to the "confirmation of the doctrine of the Church", to borrow Jerome's phrase.
The last one is the most telling as to why these books should be rejected.
These books did not conform to the doctrine of the Church then and they do not today.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03267a.htm
Do you have a LINK to this bible?
I; for one; would like to see it.